Dyna-Tech Sales Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F04D (Non-positive-displacement Pumps).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Dyna-tech ranks #35,085 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #35,085
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 9th percentile
- by Innovation Score (21.7/100)
- 8.6
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R35085 · US Corporation #35,085 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #35,085/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Durafuse Frames
- CPC-NARROW F04D · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 21.7/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 8.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Durafuse Frames, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Dyna-tech’s 21.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Dyna-tech
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Dyna-Tech Sales · this assignee 22
Dyna-Tech Sales · this assignee
22 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Dyna-tech's Innovation Score is 21.7/100 (9th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Dyna-tech?
Each dot is one of Dyna-tech’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Dyna-tech’s own 8.6 claims/patent is at or below the 14.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Dyna-tech's grants concentrate
Dyna-Tech Sales Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 42.9% of grants classified under F04D (Non-positive-displacement Pumps). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Dyna-tech sits between Durafuse Frames, LLC and E-link Technology Co., Ltd.
Who files at Dyna-Tech's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Durafuse Frames
Durafuse Frames, LLC
7 patents
- Duvas
Duvas Technologies Limited
7 patents
- Dwellwell Analyti…
Dwellwell Analytics, Inc.
7 patents
- Dyconex
Dyconex AG
7 patents
- Dynamic Mesh Netw…
Dynamic Mesh Networks, Inc.
7 patents
- Dynex
Dynex Technologies, Inc.
7 patents
- Dynomax Drilling…
Dynomax Drilling Tools Inc.
7 patents
- E-link Technology
E-link Technology Co., Ltd
7 patents
- Dyna-tech Sales ◀
Dyna-Tech Sales Corporation
7 patents
What this shows Dyna-Tech holds 7 patents at rank #35,083, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Dyna-Tech
By rank, the assignees closest to #35,083 in granted patent volume.
- Durafuse Frames, LLC #35,079 · 7 patents
- Duvas Technologies Limited #35,080 · 7 patents
- Dwellwell Analytics, Inc. #35,081 · 7 patents
- Dyconex AG #35,082 · 7 patents
- Dynamic Mesh Networks, Inc. #35,084 · 7 patents
- Dynex Technologies, Inc. #35,085 · 7 patents
- Dynomax Drilling Tools Inc. #35,086 · 7 patents
- E-link Technology Co., Ltd #35,087 · 7 patents
Leaders in F04D (Non-positive-displacement Pumps)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Dyna-Tech's primary technology class.
- General Electric Company 654 in class
- United Technologies Corporation 612 in class
- Raytheon Technologies Corporation 357 in class
- Safran Aircraft Engines 318 in class
- Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation (HSC) 259 in class
- Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. 251 in class
- Rolls-royce plc 244 in class
- BorgWarner Inc. 188 in class
Dyna-tech's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
22 9th percentile higher than 9% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2016 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2017 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2018 | 3 | 42.9% |
Which technologies does Dyna-Tech Sales Corporation patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Dyna-Tech Sales Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Dyna-Tech Sales Corporation's lead technology class is F04D (Non-positive-displacement Pumps), 42.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F04D
- Ranked #35,085 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Dyna-Tech Sales Corporation against Durafuse Frames, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 21.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.