Dura Automotive Systems SAS
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 14 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16H (Gearing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Dura ranks #28,606 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 14 technology areas.
- #28,606
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 20th percentile
- by Innovation Score (26.4/100)
- 8.8
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R28606 · Foreign Corporation #28,606 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
- MID-PACK #28,606/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH DPx Holdings B V
- CPC-FOCUS F16H · 14 areas
- INNOV-THIN 26.4/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 8.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: DPx Holdings B.V. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Dura’s 26.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Dura
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Dura Automotive… · this assignee 26
Dura Automotive… · this assignee
26 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Dura's Innovation Score is 26.4/100 (20th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Dura?
Each dot is one of Dura’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Dura’s own 8.8 claims/patent is at or below the 17.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Dura's grants concentrate
Dura Automotive Systems SAS is a focused PatentsView assignee: 14 CPC subclasses with 77.8% of grants classified under F16H (Gearing). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Dura sits between DPx Holdings B.V. and Dynamic Spine LLC.
Who files at Dura's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Dpx Holdings B V
DPx Holdings B.V.
9 patents
- Drymax
Drymax Technologies, Inc.
9 patents
- Dtcc Digital (US)
Dtcc Digital (US) Inc.
9 patents
- Dupont Nutrition…
Dupont Nutrition USA, Inc.
9 patents
- Duratap
Duratap LLC
9 patents
- Durst Phototechni…
Durst Phototechnik Digital Technology GMBH
9 patents
- Dyfan
Dyfan, LLC
9 patents
- Dynamic Spine
Dynamic Spine LLC
9 patents
- Dura Automotive S… ◀
Dura Automotive Systems SAS
9 patents
What this shows Dura holds 9 patents at rank #28,560, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Dura
By rank, the assignees closest to #28,560 in granted patent volume.
- DPx Holdings B.V. #28,556 · 9 patents
- Drymax Technologies, Inc. #28,557 · 9 patents
- Dtcc Digital (US) Inc. #28,558 · 9 patents
- Dupont Nutrition USA, Inc. #28,559 · 9 patents
- Duratap LLC #28,561 · 9 patents
- Durst Phototechnik Digital Technology GMBH #28,562 · 9 patents
- Dyfan, LLC #28,563 · 9 patents
- Dynamic Spine LLC #28,564 · 9 patents
Leaders in F16H (Gearing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Dura's primary technology class.
- Hyundai Motor Company 1,326 in class
- Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha 1,070 in class
- ZF Friedrichshafen AG 904 in class
- Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. KG 820 in class
- Ford Global Technologies, LLC 718 in class
- GM Global Technology Operations LLC 705 in class
- Honda Motor Co., Ltd. 660 in class
- KIA Motors Corporation 571 in class
Dura's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 20th percentile higher than 20% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 5 | 55.6% |
| 2016 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2017 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2018 | 1 | 11.1% |
Which technologies does Dura Automotive Systems SAS patent most?
Top 14 of 14 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Dura Automotive Systems SAS's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Dura Automotive Systems SAS's lead technology class is F16H (Gearing), 77.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16H
- Ranked #28,606 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Dura Automotive Systems SAS against DPx Holdings B.V., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 26.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.