Overall rank by patents
#4,286
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 83 granted patents across 23 technology areas, active 2015–2017. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G07F (COIN-FREED OR LIKE APPARATUS).
The verdict
Diebold holds 83 US patents across 23 technology areas, rank #4,286 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Diebold Self-service Systems, Division Of Diebold, Incorporated has been granted 83 US utility patents between 2015 and 2017, placing Diebold Self-service Systems, Division Of Diebold, Incorporated at rank #4,286 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 23 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 16.2 claims per patent with primary concentration in G07F (COIN-FREED OR LIKE APPARATUS). As a US Corporation, Diebold Self-service Systems, Division Of Diebold, Incorporated is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Diebold sits between Cipla Limited (83 patents, rank #4,282) and Etron Technology, Inc. (83 patents, rank #4,290) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 42.0/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 83 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Diebold Self-service Systems, Division Of Diebold, Incorporated's 16.2 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 23 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Diebold Self-service Systems, Division Of Diebold, Incorporated against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Cipla Limited
83 patents
Clemson University
83 patents
CommScope Connectivity UK Limited
83 patents
Cornell Research Foundation, Inc.
83 patents
EMS-Patent AG
83 patents
Electronic Theatre Controls, Inc.
83 patents
Elemental LED, Inc.
83 patents
Etron Technology, Inc.
83 patents
Diebold Self-Service Systems, Division of Diebold, Incorporated
83 patents
What this shows Diebold holds 83 patents at rank #4,286, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #4,286 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Diebold's primary technology class.
Diebold's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
42 Top 32% higher than 68% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 32 | 38.6% |
| 2016 | 31 | 37.3% |
| 2017 | 20 | 24.1% |
Top 15 of 23 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#4,286
Across all tracked assignees
42.0 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Diebold's 83 grants land it in the top 32% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.