Overall rank by patents
#4,282
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 83 granted patents across 18 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61K (PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES).
The verdict
Cipla holds 83 US patents across 18 technology areas, rank #4,282 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Cipla Limited has been granted 83 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Cipla Limited at rank #4,282 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 18 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 16.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61K (PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES). As a Foreign Corporation, Cipla Limited is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Cipla sits between Bell Textron Inc. (83 patents, rank #4,278) and Diebold Self-service Systems, Division Of Diebold, Incorporated (83 patents, rank #4,286) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 43.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 29 grants, compared with 54 in the 2015–2019 window, a -46% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Cipla Limited's 16.8 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 18 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Cipla Limited against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Bell Textron Inc.
83 patents
BenQ Materials Corporation
83 patents
Brien Holden Vision Institute Limited
83 patents
Change Healthcare Holdings, LLC
83 patents
Clemson University
83 patents
CommScope Connectivity UK Limited
83 patents
Cornell Research Foundation, Inc.
83 patents
Diebold Self-Service Systems, Division of Diebold, Incorporated
83 patents
Cipla Limited
83 patents
What this shows Cipla holds 83 patents at rank #4,282, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #4,282 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cipla's primary technology class.
Cipla's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
44 Top 28% higher than 72% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 11 | 13.3% |
| 2016 | 8 | 9.6% |
| 2017 | 3 | 3.6% |
| 2018 | 17 | 20.5% |
| 2019 | 15 | 18.1% |
| 2020 | 4 | 4.8% |
| 2021 | 8 | 9.6% |
| 2022 | 6 | 7.2% |
| 2023 | 2 | 2.4% |
| 2024 | 5 | 6.0% |
| 2025 | 4 | 4.8% |
Top 15 of 18 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#4,282
Across all tracked assignees
43.6 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Cipla's 83 grants land it in the top 28% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.