Diebold Nixdorf Systems GMBH
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 20 granted patents across 15 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2023–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Diebold ranks #14,564 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 20 patents across 15 technology areas.
- #14,564
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 15%
- by Innovation Score (49.1/100)
- 8.1
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R14564 · Foreign Corporation #14,564 · 20 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-SMALL 20 grants
- MID-PACK #14,564/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Daelim Industrial
- CPC-FOCUS G07F · 15 areas
- INNOV-PAR 49.1/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 8.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- SPAN-YRS 2023–2025 · 3y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Daelim Industrial Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Diebold’s 49.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Diebold
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Diebold Nixdorf… · this assignee
Diebold Nixdorf… · this assignee
49 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Diebold's Innovation Score is 49.1/100 (top 15% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Diebold?
Each dot is one of Diebold’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Diebold’s own 8.1 claims/patent is at or below the 8.5 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Diebold's grants concentrate
Diebold Nixdorf Systems GMBH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 15 CPC subclasses with 45% of grants classified under G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (12 grants) versus a trough of 6 in 2024. By volume, Diebold sits between Daelim Industrial Co., Ltd. and DKB Household UK Limited.
Diebold's three-year grant acceleration
Diebold Nixdorf Systems GMBH shows 18 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Diebold's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Daelim Industrial
Daelim Industrial Co., Ltd.
20 patents
- Danyang UPC Auto…
Danyang UPC Auto Parts Co., Ltd.
20 patents
- Dephy
Dephy, Inc.
20 patents
- Dermavant Sciences
Dermavant Sciences GMBH
20 patents
- Digital Guardian
Digital Guardian LLC
20 patents
- Digital Reasoning…
Digital Reasoning Systems, Inc.
20 patents
- Dipsol Chemicals
Dipsol Chemicals Co., Ltd.
20 patents
- DKB Household UK
DKB Household UK Limited
20 patents
- Diebold Nixdorf S… ◀
Diebold Nixdorf Systems GMBH
20 patents
What this shows Diebold holds 20 patents at rank #14,559, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Diebold
By rank, the assignees closest to #14,559 in granted patent volume.
- Daelim Industrial Co., Ltd. #14,555 · 20 patents
- Danyang UPC Auto Parts Co., Ltd. #14,556 · 20 patents
- Dephy, Inc. #14,557 · 20 patents
- Dermavant Sciences GMBH #14,558 · 20 patents
- Digital Guardian LLC #14,560 · 20 patents
- Digital Reasoning Systems, Inc. #14,561 · 20 patents
- Dipsol Chemicals Co., Ltd. #14,562 · 20 patents
- DKB Household UK Limited #14,563 · 20 patents
Leaders in G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Diebold's primary technology class.
Diebold's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
49 Top 15% higher than 85% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2023–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 12 | 60.0% |
| 2024 | 6 | 30.0% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 10.0% |
Which technologies does Diebold Nixdorf Systems GMBH patent most?
Top 15 of 15 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Diebold Nixdorf Systems GMBH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Diebold Nixdorf Systems GMBH's lead technology class is G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus), 45% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G07F
- Ranked #14,564 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Diebold Nixdorf Systems GMBH against Daelim Industrial Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 49.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.