Where does Diamond Game Enterprises rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Diamond Game Enterprises ranks #21,002 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Diamond Game Enterprises hold?

Diamond Game Enterprises holds 13 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2023, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Diamond Game Enterprises's Innovation Score?

Diamond Game Enterprises has an Innovation Score of 32.0 out of 100 (40th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Diamond Game Enterprises focus on?

Diamond Game Enterprises's top technology area is G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus) with 12 patents, ranking #158 of 1,075 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

Is Diamond Game Enterprises's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Diamond Game Enterprises's recent grant velocity is -37% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Diamond Game Enterprises's patents?

Diamond Game Enterprises's patents average 20.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Diamond Game Enterprises patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Diamond Game Enterprises

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Diamond ranks #21,002 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 4 technology areas.

#21,002
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 40th percentile
by Innovation Score (32.0/100): 20.8
avg claims per patent: -37%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R21002 · US Corporation #21,002 · 13 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
MID-PACK #21,002/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Delvaux Createur
CPC-NARROW G07F · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 32.0/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 20.8 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DOWN -37% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Delvaux Createur SA (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Diamond’s 32.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.1 pts (28%) Velocity 3.3 pts (10%) Breadth 7.1 pts (22%) Claim depth 12.5 pts (39%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Diamond Game… · this assignee

32
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Diamond's Innovation Score is 32.0/100 (40th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Diamond?

Each dot is one of Diamond’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Diamond’s own 20.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 9.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Diamond vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Diamond's grants concentrate

Diamond Game Enterprises is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 92.3% of grants classified under G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Diamond sits between Delvaux Createur SA and Dolce & Gabbana S.R.L..

Diamond's three-year grant acceleration

Diamond Game Enterprises shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Delvaux Createur

13
Demby Development

13
Derq

13
Dh2i

13
Diesel S P A

13
Discord

13
Doben

13
Dolce & Gabbana S…

13
Diamond Game Ente… ◀

13

What this shows Diamond holds 13 patents at rank #20,994, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Diamond

By rank, the assignees closest to #20,994 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Diamond's primary technology class.

Diamond's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

32 40th percentile higher than 40% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Diamond Game Enterprises patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	15.4%
2016	1	7.7%
2017	1	7.7%
2018	3	23.1%
2019	1	7.7%
2020	1	7.7%
2021	2	15.4%
2022	1	7.7%
2023	1	7.7%

Which technologies does Diamond Game Enterprises patent most?

G07F - Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus 12

A63F - Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 6

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 1

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Diamond Game Enterprises's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Diamond Game Enterprises's lead technology class is G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus), 92.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G07F
Ranked #21,002 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Diamond Game Enterprises against Delvaux Createur SA, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 32.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.