Overall rank by patents
#39,727
of 49,997 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A45C (PURSES; LUGGAGE; Hand Carried Bags).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Daca ranks #39,727 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 3 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R39727 · US Corporation #39,727 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: Da Volterra (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
J-oil Mills · near
29 score
JOY Global Longview… · near
29 score
Silver Creek… · near
29 score
Daca Design · this assignee
29 score
Mitsubishi Hitachi… · near
29 score
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Daca's Innovation Score is 28.7/100 (28th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Daca Design LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under A45C (PURSES; LUGGAGE; Hand Carried Bags). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Daca sits between Dyln Inc. and Dairy Australia Limited.
Daca Design LLC shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Dyln Inc.
6 patents
Dynamic Closures Corporation
6 patents
Dynamic Controls
6 patents
Da Volterra
6 patents
Daetwyler Sealing Technologies Deutschland Gmbh
6 patents
Daewon Semiconductor Packaging Industrial Company
6 patents
Daewoo Electronics Corporation
6 patents
Dairy Australia Limited
6 patents
Daca Design LLC
6 patents
What this shows Daca holds 6 patents at rank #39,817, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #39,817 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Daca's primary technology class.
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Daca, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (29 here).
Daca's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
29 28th percentile higher than 28% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2021 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2022 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2024 | 1 | 16.7% |
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#39,727
of 49,997 tracked assignees
28.7 out of 100
What to do with this data
Daca Design LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.