Dynamic Closures Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E06B (Fixed OR Movable Closures FOR Openings IN Buildings, Vehicles, Fences OR Like Enclosures IN General, e.g. Doors, Windows, Blinds, Gates).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Dynamic ranks #39,918 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #39,918
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 5th percentile
- by Innovation Score (19.0/100)
- 6.0
- avg claims per patent
- -80%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R39918 · Foreign Corporation #39,918 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #39,918/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Da Volterra
- CPC-NARROW E06B · 6 areas
- INNOV-LOW 19.0/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -80% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Da Volterra (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Dynamic’s 19.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Dynamic
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Dynamic Closures · this assignee 19
Dynamic Closures · this assignee
19 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Dynamic's Innovation Score is 19.0/100 (5th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Dynamic?
Each dot is one of Dynamic’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Dynamic’s own 6.0 claims/patent is at or below the 15.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Dynamic's grants concentrate
Dynamic Closures Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under E06B (Fixed OR Movable Closures FOR Openings IN Buildings, Vehicles, Fences OR Like Enclosures IN General, e.g. Doors, Windows, Blinds, Gates). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Dynamic sits between Durst Sebring Revolution, LLC and Daetwyler Sealing Technologies Deutschland Gmbh.
Who files at Dynamic's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Durst Sebring Rev…
Durst Sebring Revolution, LLC
6 patents
- Dwfritz Automation
DWFritz Automation, LLC
6 patents
- Dxterity Diagnost…
Dxterity Diagnostics Incorporated
6 patents
- Dyln
Dyln Inc.
6 patents
- Dynamic Controls
Dynamic Controls
6 patents
- Da Volterra
Da Volterra
6 patents
- Daca Design
Daca Design LLC
6 patents
- Daetwyler Sealing…
Daetwyler Sealing Technologies Deutschland Gmbh
6 patents
- Dynamic Closures ◀
Dynamic Closures Corporation
6 patents
What this shows Dynamic holds 6 patents at rank #39,814, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Dynamic
By rank, the assignees closest to #39,814 in granted patent volume.
- Durst Sebring Revolution, LLC #39,810 · 6 patents
- DWFritz Automation, LLC #39,811 · 6 patents
- Dxterity Diagnostics Incorporated #39,812 · 6 patents
- Dyln Inc. #39,813 · 6 patents
- Dynamic Controls #39,815 · 6 patents
- Da Volterra #39,816 · 6 patents
- Daca Design LLC #39,817 · 6 patents
- Daetwyler Sealing Technologies Deutschland Gmbh #39,818 · 6 patents
Leaders in E06B (Fixed OR Movable Closures FOR Openings IN Buildings)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Dynamic's primary technology class.
Dynamic's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
19 5th percentile higher than 5% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2018 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2020 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Dynamic Closures Corporation patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Dynamic Closures Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Dynamic Closures Corporation's lead technology class is E06B (Fixed OR Movable Closures FOR Openings IN Buildings, Vehicles, Fences OR Like Enclosures IN General, e.g. Doors, Windows, Blinds, Gates), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E06B
- Ranked #39,918 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Dynamic Closures Corporation against Durst Sebring Revolution, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 19.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.