Where does Cyberswarm, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Cyberswarm, Inc. ranks #28,519 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Cyberswarm, Inc. hold?

Cyberswarm, Inc. holds 9 US utility patents granted between 2021 and 2024, spanning 10 technology areas.

What is Cyberswarm, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Cyberswarm, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 42.0 out of 100 (top 32% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Cyberswarm, Inc. focus on?

Cyberswarm, Inc.'s top technology area is H10N (Electric Solid-state Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR) with 5 patents, ranking #260 of 891 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 10 CPC subclasses total.

Is Cyberswarm, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Cyberswarm, Inc..

What does claim depth mean for Cyberswarm, Inc.'s patents?

Cyberswarm, Inc.'s patents average 15.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Cyberswarm, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Cyberswarm, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2021–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H10N (Electric Solid-state Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Cyberswarm ranks #28,519 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 10 technology areas.

#28,519
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 32%
by Innovation Score (42.0/100): 15.9
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R28519 · US Corporation #28,519 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
MID-PACK #28,519/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Cable Management…
CPC-FOCUS H10N · 10 areas
INNOV-PAR 42.0/100
CLAIMS-RICH 15.9 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
SPAN-YRS 2021–2024 · 4y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cable Management Solutions Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Cyberswarm’s 42.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.0 pts (19%) Velocity 13.3 pts (32%) Breadth 11.2 pts (27%) Claim depth 9.5 pts (23%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Cyberswarm · this assignee

42
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Cyberswarm's Innovation Score is 42.0/100 (top 32% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cyberswarm?

Each dot is one of Cyberswarm’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cyberswarm’s own 15.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Cyberswarm vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Cyberswarm's grants concentrate

Cyberswarm, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 55.6% of grants classified under H10N (Electric Solid-state Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2023. By volume, Cyberswarm sits between Cubicure GMBH and Calcean Minerals and Materials, LLC.

Cyberswarm's three-year grant acceleration

Cyberswarm, Inc. shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Cubicure

9
Curaco

9
Curiox Biosystems…

9
CVG Management

9
Cable Management…

9
Cadenza Innovation

9
Caelus

9
Calcean Minerals…

9
Cyberswarm ◀

9

What this shows Cyberswarm holds 9 patents at rank #28,414, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Cyberswarm

By rank, the assignees closest to #28,414 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H10N (Electric Solid-state Devices)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cyberswarm's primary technology class.

Cyberswarm's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

42 Top 32% higher than 68% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2021–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Cyberswarm, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2021	3	33.3%
2022	4	44.4%
2023	1	11.1%
2024	1	11.1%

Which technologies does Cyberswarm, Inc. patent most?

H10N - Electric Solid-state Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 5

G11C - Static Stores 5

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 3

H10B - Electronic Memory Devices 2

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 2

C08G - Macromolecular Compounds Obtained Otherwise Than BY Reactions Only Involving Unsaturated Carbon-to-carbon Bonds 1

C08B - POLYSACCHARIDES; Derivatives Thereof 1

C08L - Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds 1

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 1

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 1

Top 10 of 10 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Cyberswarm, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Cyberswarm, Inc.'s lead technology class is H10N (Electric Solid-state Devices NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 55.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H10N
Ranked #28,519 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Cyberswarm, Inc. against Cubicure GMBH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 42.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.