PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Chelsea Building Products, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 60 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Chelsea ranks #5,656 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 60 patents across 0 technology areas.

#5,656
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
12th percentile
by Innovation Score (23.4/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent
-61%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R5656 · US Corporation #5,656 · 60 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-SMALL 60 grants
  • UPPER-Q #5,656/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Breathe
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-THIN 23.4/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -61% vel
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Breathe Technologies, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Chelsea’s 23.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Chelsea

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Chelsea's Innovation Score is 23.4/100 (12th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Chelsea?

Each dot is one of Chelsea’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Chelsea’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 18.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Chelsea vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 59.960.060.06060.060.060.1 010203040 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Breathe Technologies, Inc. - 60, 21.9BreatheCytokinetics, Inc. - 60, 23.1CytokineticsCYTONOME/ST, LLC - 60, 18.92Cytonome/STCaraway Home, Inc. - 60, 2.2Caraway HomeCuriouser Products Inc. - 60, 20.57Curiouser ProductsCyara Solutions Pty Ltd - 60, 9.42Cyara Solutions P…D5ai LLC - 60, 31.8D5aiDaon Holdings Limited - 60, 15Daon HoldingsChelsea Building Products, Inc. - 60, 1Chelsea Building…
Chelsea vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Chelsea's grants concentrate

Chelsea Building Products, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2017 (17 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Chelsea sits between Breathe Technologies, Inc. and Daon Holdings Limited.

Chelsea's three-year grant acceleration

Chelsea Building Products, Inc. shows 9 grants in 2022–2024 against only 7 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Chelsea's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Chelsea holds 60 patents at rank #5,657, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Chelsea

By rank, the assignees closest to #5,657 in granted patent volume.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Chelsea, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (23 here).

Casper Sleep Inc. 23 Allergy Research Group, LLC 23 Sony Media Cloud Services LLC 23 USM Holding AG 23

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (1.0 here).

StreetCar ORV, LLC 1.0 avg Kolster Holding B.V. 1.0 avg Innovaplant Zierpflanzen GmbH + Co. KG 1.0 avg Garden Genetics LLC 1.0 avg

Chelsea's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

23 12th percentile higher than 12% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

05101520 201520162017201820192020202120242025 7
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Chelsea Building Products, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 3 5.0%
2016 10 16.7%
2017 17 28.3%
2018 7 11.7%
2019 1 1.7%
2020 5 8.3%
2021 1 1.7%
2024 9 15.0%
2025partial year 7 11.7%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Chelsea Building Products, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #5,656 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Chelsea Building Products, Inc. against Breathe Technologies, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 23.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.