Crackle, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 17 granted patents across 14 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Crackle ranks #16,709 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 17 patents across 14 technology areas.
- #16,709
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 44%
- by Innovation Score (37.4/100)
- 18.1
- avg claims per patent
- +13%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R16709 · US Corporation #16,709 · 17 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 17 grants
- MID-PACK #16,709/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH ContiTech Luftfeders…
- CPC-FOCUS H04N · 14 areas
- INNOV-THIN 37.4/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-UP +13% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: ContiTech Luftfedersysteme GmbH (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Crackle’s 37.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Crackle
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Crackle · this assignee
Crackle · this assignee
37 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Crackle's Innovation Score is 37.4/100 (top 44% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Crackle?
Each dot is one of Crackle’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Crackle’s own 18.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Crackle's grants concentrate
Crackle, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 14 CPC subclasses with 52.9% of grants classified under H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Crackle sits between ContiTech Luftfedersysteme GmbH and Custom Medical Applications, Inc..
Crackle's three-year grant acceleration
Crackle, Inc. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 8 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Crackle's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Contitech Luftfed…
ContiTech Luftfedersysteme GmbH
17 patents
- Contitech Vibrati…
ContiTech Vibration Control GmbH
17 patents
- Coreline Soft
Coreline Soft Co., Ltd.
17 patents
- Country Casual Te…
Country Casual Teak, Inc.
17 patents
- Creganna Unlimited
Creganna Unlimited Company
17 patents
- Critical Innovati…
Critical Innovations, LLC
17 patents
- Crucell Holland B…
Crucell Holland B.V.
17 patents
- Custom Medical Ap…
Custom Medical Applications, Inc.
17 patents
- Crackle ◀
Crackle, Inc.
17 patents
What this shows Crackle holds 17 patents at rank #16,714, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Crackle
By rank, the assignees closest to #16,714 in granted patent volume.
- ContiTech Luftfedersysteme GmbH #16,710 · 17 patents
- ContiTech Vibration Control GmbH #16,711 · 17 patents
- Coreline Soft Co., Ltd. #16,712 · 17 patents
- Country Casual Teak, Inc. #16,713 · 17 patents
- Creganna Unlimited Company #16,715 · 17 patents
- Critical Innovations, LLC #16,716 · 17 patents
- Crucell Holland B.V. #16,717 · 17 patents
- Custom Medical Applications, Inc. #16,718 · 17 patents
Leaders in H04N (Pictorial Communication)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Crackle's primary technology class.
Crackle's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
37 Top 44% higher than 56% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 3 | 17.6% |
| 2018 | 2 | 11.8% |
| 2019 | 3 | 17.6% |
| 2020 | 4 | 23.5% |
| 2021 | 1 | 5.9% |
| 2022 | 2 | 11.8% |
| 2023 | 2 | 11.8% |
Which technologies does Crackle, Inc. patent most?
Top 14 of 14 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Crackle, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Crackle, Inc.'s lead technology class is H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television), 52.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04N
- Ranked #16,709 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Crackle, Inc. against ContiTech Luftfedersysteme GmbH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 37.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.