PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Cqms PTY Ltd

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 21 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E02F (DREDGING; Soil-shifting).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Cqms ranks #13,932 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 21 patents across 7 technology areas.

#13,932
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
47th percentile
by Innovation Score (34.2/100)
15.3
avg claims per patent
-9%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R13932 · Foreign Corporation #13,932 · 21 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 21 grants
  • MID-PACK #13,932/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Cana Technology
  • CPC-NARROW E02F · 7 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 34.2/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 15.3 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-FLAT -9% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cana Technology, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Cqms’s 34.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cqms

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Cqms's Innovation Score is 34.2/100 (47th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cqms?

Each dot is one of Cqms’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cqms’s own 15.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Cqms vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 20.920.92121.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Classic Home & Garden, LLC. - 21, 5.38Classic Home & Ga…Collibra Belgium BV - 21, 18.67Collibra Belgium…Conextions, Inc. - 21, 14.33ConextionsContinuus Materials Intellectual Property, LLC - 21, 19Continuus Materia…CVRx, Inc. - 21, 11.67CvrxCana Technology, Inc. - 21, 22.86Cana TechnologyCarbon Holdings Intellectual Properties, LLC - 21, 14.71Carbon Holdings I…CareFusion Corporation - 21, 16.81CarefusionCqms PTY Ltd - 21, 15.33Cqms PTY
Cqms vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Cqms's grants concentrate

Cqms PTY Ltd is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 81% of grants classified under E02F (DREDGING; Soil-shifting). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (4 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2016. By volume, Cqms sits between Classic Home & Garden, LLC. and CareFusion Corporation.

Cqms's three-year grant acceleration

Cqms PTY Ltd shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 8 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Cqms's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Cqms holds 21 patents at rank #13,915, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Cqms

By rank, the assignees closest to #13,915 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in E02F (Dredging)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cqms's primary technology class.

Cqms's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

34 47th percentile higher than 47% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

1.522.533.544.5 20152016201720192020202120232024 4
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Cqms PTY Ltd patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 3 14.3%
2016 2 9.5%
2017 2 9.5%
2019 4 19.0%
2020 2 9.5%
2021 2 9.5%
2023 2 9.5%
2024 4 19.0%

Which technologies does Cqms PTY Ltd patent most?

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Cqms PTY Ltd's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Cqms PTY Ltd's lead technology class is E02F (DREDGING; Soil-shifting), 81% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E02F
  • Ranked #13,932 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Cqms PTY Ltd against Classic Home & Garden, LLC., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 34.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.