Where does Cobham Colorado Springs Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Cobham Colorado Springs Inc. ranks #45,770 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Cobham Colorado Springs Inc. hold?

Cobham Colorado Springs Inc. holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2022, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is Cobham Colorado Springs Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Cobham Colorado Springs Inc. has an Innovation Score of 31.3 out of 100 (37th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Cobham Colorado Springs Inc. focus on?

Cobham Colorado Springs Inc.'s top technology area is H03K (Pulse Technique) with 2 patents, ranking #751 of 1,682 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

Is Cobham Colorado Springs Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Cobham Colorado Springs Inc..

What does claim depth mean for Cobham Colorado Springs Inc.'s patents?

Cobham Colorado Springs Inc.'s patents average 18.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Cobham Colorado Springs Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Cobham Colorado Springs Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H03K (Pulse Technique).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Cobham ranks #45,770 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 7 technology areas.

#45,770
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 37th percentile
by Innovation Score (31.3/100): 18.8
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R45770 · US Corporation #45,770 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #45,770/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Cngmotive
CPC-NARROW H03K · 7 areas
INNOV-THIN 31.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 18.8 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
SPAN-YRS 2020–2022 · 3y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cngmotive, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Cobham’s 31.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (20%) Velocity 4.4 pts (14%) Breadth 9.4 pts (30%) Claim depth 11.3 pts (36%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Cobham Colorado… · this assignee

31
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Cobham's Innovation Score is 31.3/100 (37th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cobham?

Each dot is one of Cobham’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cobham’s own 18.8 claims/patent is at or below the 19.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Cobham vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Cobham's grants concentrate

Cobham Colorado Springs Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 40% of grants classified under H03K (Pulse Technique). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Cobham sits between Cngmotive, Inc. and Cogent Spine LLC.

Cobham's three-year grant acceleration

Cobham Colorado Springs Inc. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Cngmotive

5
Cnooc Petroleum N…

5
Coapt

5
Coastal PET Produ…

5
Cobi

5
Cochrane Steel Pr…

5
Codex Beauty

5
Cogent Spine

5
Cobham Colorado S… ◀

5

What this shows Cobham holds 5 patents at rank #45,598, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Cobham

By rank, the assignees closest to #45,598 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H03K (Pulse Technique)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cobham's primary technology class.

Cobham's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

31 37th percentile higher than 37% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Cobham Colorado Springs Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	1	20.0%
2021	2	40.0%
2022	2	40.0%

Which technologies does Cobham Colorado Springs Inc. patent most?

H03K - Pulse Technique 2

G01R - Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables 1

H01L - Semiconductor Devices NOT Covered BY Class H10 1

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 1

H01H - Electric SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; Emergency Protective Devices 1

H03L - Automatic Control, Starting, Synchronisation OR Stabilisation OF Generators OF Electronic Oscillations OR Pulses 1

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 1

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Cobham Colorado Springs Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Cobham Colorado Springs Inc.'s lead technology class is H03K (Pulse Technique), 40% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H03K
Ranked #45,770 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Cobham Colorado Springs Inc. against Cngmotive, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 31.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.