USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Cirrus Logic International (UK) Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2015. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G10K (Sound-producing DEVICES; Methods OR Devices FOR Protecting Against, OR FOR Damping, Noise OR Other Acoustic Waves IN GENERAL; Acoustics NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Cirrus ranks #39,471 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 10 technology areas.

#39,471
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
43rd percentile
by Innovation Score (32.9/100)
29.0
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R39471 · Foreign Corporation #39,471 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
  • LOWER-Q #39,471/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Cipherloc
  • CPC-FOCUS G10K · 10 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 32.9/100
  • CLAIMS-DENSE 29.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cipherloc, Inc (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Cirrus’s 32.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cirrus

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Cirrus's Innovation Score is 32.9/100 (43rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cirrus?

Each dot is one of Cirrus’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cirrus’s own 29.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Cirrus vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 5.96.06.066.06.06.1 010203040 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Cipherloc, Inc - 6, 5.33CipherlocCircassia AB - 6, 10.33Circassia ABCircular Commitment Company - 6, 11.83Circular Commitme…CircumFIx Solutions, Inc. - 6, 15.17Circumfix Solutio…Cirrus Outdoors, LLC - 6, 5Cirrus OutdoorsCitadel Casing Ltd - 6, 13.67Citadel CasingCivan Advanced Technologies Ltd. - 6, 15.5Civan AdvancedCivil Aviation Flight University of China - 6, 7Civil Aviation Fl…Cirrus Logic International (UK) Limited - 6, 29Cirrus Logic Inte…
Cirrus vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Cirrus's grants concentrate

Cirrus Logic International (UK) Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under G10K (Sound-producing DEVICES; Methods OR Devices FOR Protecting Against, OR FOR Damping, Noise OR Other Acoustic Waves IN GENERAL; Acoustics NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). By volume, Cirrus sits between Cipherloc, Inc and Civil Aviation Flight University of China.

Who files at Cirrus's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Cirrus holds 6 patents at rank #39,576, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Cirrus

By rank, the assignees closest to #39,576 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G10K (Sound-producing Devices)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cirrus's primary technology class.

Cirrus's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 43rd percentile higher than 43% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Cirrus Logic International (UK) Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Cirrus Logic International (UK) Limited's lead technology class is G10K (Sound-producing DEVICES; Methods OR Devices FOR Protecting Against, OR FOR Damping, Noise OR Other Acoustic Waves IN GENERAL; Acoustics NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 33.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G10K
  • Ranked #39,471 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Cirrus Logic International (UK) Limited against Cipherloc, Inc, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 32.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.