Overall rank by patents
#11,604
of 50,000 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 26 granted patents across 23 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C09D (COATING COMPOSITIONS, e.g. PAINTS, VARNISHES OR LACQUERS; FILLING PASTES; CHEMICAL PAINT OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; CORRECTING FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; PASTES OR SOLIDS FOR COLOURING OR PRINTING; USE OF MATERI).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Chromatic ranks #11,604 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 26 patents across 23 technology areas.
Chromatic Technologies, Inc. has been granted 26 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Chromatic Technologies, Inc. at #11,604 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 23 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 16.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in C09D (COATING COMPOSITIONS, e.g. PAINTS, VARNISHES OR LACQUERS; FILLING PASTES; CHEMICAL PAINT OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; CORRECTING FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; PASTES OR SOLIDS FOR COLOURING OR PRINTING; USE OF MATERI). As a US Corporation, Chromatic Technologies, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Chromatic sits between Chart Energy & Chemicals, Inc. (26 patents, rank #11,602) and Con Edison Battery Storage, Llc (26 patents, rank #11,610) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 42.7/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Between 2020 and 2024 the company received 4 grants, compared with 21 in the 2015–2019 window, a -81% shift in five-year grant velocity. Both windows cover five complete grant years; the latest PatentsView year is a partial release and is excluded from this comparison, though it still appears in the yearly table and chart below. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The US Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.
Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Chromatic Technologies, Inc.'s 16.6 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 23 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Chart Energy & Chemicals, Inc.
26 patents
China Jiliang University
26 patents
China University of Petroleum
26 patents
Chiral Photonics, Inc.
26 patents
Code42 Software, Inc.
26 patents
Colebrook Bosson & Saunders (Products) Limited
26 patents
Comeup Industries Inc.
26 patents
Con Edison Battery Storage, LLC
26 patents
Chromatic Technologies, Inc.
26 patents
What this shows Chromatic holds 26 patents at rank #11,606, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #11,606 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Chromatic's primary technology class.
Chromatic's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
43 Top 30% higher than 70% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 15.4% |
| 2016 | 4 | 15.4% |
| 2017 | 9 | 34.6% |
| 2018 | 3 | 11.5% |
| 2019 | 1 | 3.8% |
| 2020 | 2 | 7.7% |
| 2022 | 1 | 3.8% |
| 2024 | 1 | 3.8% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 3.8% |
Top 15 of 23 technology areas
Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.
Overall rank by patents
#11,604
of 50,000 tracked assignees
42.7 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Chromatic's 26 grants land it in the top 30% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.