PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Chicagoland Grows, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 31 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Chicagoland ranks #9,999 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 31 patents across 0 technology areas.

#9,999
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
3rd percentile
by Innovation Score (15.4/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent
-57%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R9999 · US Corporation #9,999 · 31 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-SMALL 31 grants
  • UPPER-Q #9,999/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Cellular Research
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-LOW 15.4/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -57% vel
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cellular Research, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Chicagoland’s 15.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Chicagoland

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Chicagoland's Innovation Score is 15.4/100 (3rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Chicagoland?

Each dot is one of Chicagoland’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Chicagoland’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 19.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Chicagoland vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 30.93131.1 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Cellular Research, Inc. - 31, 24.16Cellular ResearchCentre Hospitalier Universitaire DE Toulouse - 31, 9.42Centre Hospitalie…Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (C.H.U.V.) - 31, 16.48Centre Hospitalie…CFS Concrete Forming Systems Inc. - 31, 23.9CFS Concrete Form…Circlesx LLC - 31, 19.35CirclesxCloud & Stream Gears LLC - 31, 19.68Cloud & Stream Ge…Cold Chain Technologies, LLC - 31, 25.23Cold ChainColormatrix Holdings, Inc. - 31, 17.68Colormatrix Holdi…Chicagoland Grows, Inc. - 31, 1Chicagoland Grows
Chicagoland vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Chicagoland's grants concentrate

Chicagoland Grows, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2015 (10 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Chicagoland sits between Cellular Research, Inc. and Colormatrix Holdings, Inc..

Chicagoland's three-year grant acceleration

Chicagoland Grows, Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 7 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Chicagoland's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Chicagoland holds 31 patents at rank #9,994, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Chicagoland

By rank, the assignees closest to #9,994 in granted patent volume.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Chicagoland, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (15 here).

TEFAL 15 Fuzhou Esun Electronic Co., Ltd 15 FAT Brain TOY Co., LLC 15 Kikkerland Design, Inc. 15

Chicagoland's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

15 3rd percentile higher than 3% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

024681012 2015201620172018201920202021202220242025 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Chicagoland Grows, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 10 32.3%
2016 1 3.2%
2017 5 16.1%
2018 4 12.9%
2019 1 3.2%
2020 3 9.7%
2021 3 9.7%
2022 1 3.2%
2024 2 6.5%
2025partial year 1 3.2%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Chicagoland Grows, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #9,999 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Chicagoland Grows, Inc. against Cellular Research, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 15.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.