USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Kikkerland Design, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 69 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Kikkerland ranks #5,020 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 69 patents across 0 technology areas.

#5,020
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
3rd percentile
by Innovation Score (15.3/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent
-99%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R5020 · US Corporation #5,020 · 69 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-SMALL 69 grants
  • UPPER-Q #5,020/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Interroll Holding
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-LOW 15.3/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -99% vel
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Interroll Holding AG (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Kikkerland’s 15.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Kikkerland

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Kikkerland's Innovation Score is 15.3/100 (3rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Kikkerland?

Each dot is one of Kikkerland’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Kikkerland’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 15.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Kikkerland vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 68.969.069.06969.069.069.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Intouch Technologies, Inc. - 69, 16.39IntouchInterroll Holding AG - 69, 15.33Interroll HoldingJST Performance, LLC - 69, 6.78JST PerformanceKyulux, Inc. - 69, 13.33KyuluxLenzing Aktiengesellschaft - 69, 14.46Lenzing Aktienges…Litepoint Corporation - 69, 15.87LitepointLightmatter, Inc. - 69, 19.77LightmatterMallinckrodt LLC - 69, 19.19MallinckrodtKikkerland Design, Inc. - 69, 1Kikkerland Design
Kikkerland vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Kikkerland's grants concentrate

Kikkerland Design, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2015 (23 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Kikkerland sits between Intouch Technologies, Inc. and Mallinckrodt LLC.

Who files at Kikkerland's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Kikkerland holds 69 patents at rank #5,021, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Kikkerland

By rank, the assignees closest to #5,021 in granted patent volume.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Kikkerland, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Kikkerland's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

15 3rd percentile higher than 3% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0510152025 201520162017201820192020 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Kikkerland Design, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 23 33.3%
2016 17 24.6%
2017 8 11.6%
2018 18 26.1%
2019 2 2.9%
2020 1 1.4%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Kikkerland Design, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #5,020 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Kikkerland Design, Inc. against Intouch Technologies, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 15.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.