FAT Brain TOY Co., LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63H (Toys, e.g. Tops, Dolls, Hoops OR Building Blocks).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, FAT ranks #31,617 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 1 technology areas.
- #31,617
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 3rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (15.3/100)
- 3.3
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R31617 · US Corporation #31,617 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #31,617/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Fasoo
- CPC-NARROW A63H · 1 areas
- INNOV-LOW 15.3/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 3.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2020–2024 · 5y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Fasoo Co., Ltd (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How FAT’s 15.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around FAT
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- FAT Brain TOY · this assignee 15
FAT Brain TOY · this assignee
15 score
- Kikkerland Design · near 15
Kikkerland Design · near
15 score
- Tasaki & · near 15
Tasaki & · near
15 score
- Omega · near 15
Omega · near
15 score
- Trophius Pty · near 15
Trophius Pty · near
15 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows FAT's Innovation Score is 15.3/100 (3rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for FAT?
Each dot is one of FAT’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). FAT’s own 3.3 claims/patent is at or below the 16.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where FAT's grants concentrate
FAT Brain TOY Co., LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 12.5% of grants classified under A63H (Toys, e.g. Tops, Dolls, Hoops OR Building Blocks). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, FAT sits between Fasoo Co., Ltd and Ferfics Limited.
FAT's three-year grant acceleration
FAT Brain TOY Co., LLC shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at FAT's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Fasoo
Fasoo Co., Ltd
8 patents
- Fastcase
Fastcase, Inc.
8 patents
- Faster S P A
Faster S.P.A.
8 patents
- Fastwave Medical
Fastwave Medical Inc.
8 patents
- Favepc
Favepc Inc.
8 patents
- Fccl Partnership
Fccl Partnership
8 patents
- Fenf
Fenf, LLC
8 patents
- Ferfics
Ferfics Limited
8 patents
- FAT Brain TOY ◀
FAT Brain TOY Co., LLC
8 patents
What this shows FAT holds 8 patents at rank #31,611, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near FAT
By rank, the assignees closest to #31,611 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in A63H (Toys)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in FAT's primary technology class.
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for FAT, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A63H (Toys), FAT ranks #181 of 312 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (15 here).
FAT's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
15 3rd percentile higher than 3% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2021 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2024 | 1 | 12.5% |
Which technologies does FAT Brain TOY Co., LLC patent most?
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
FAT Brain TOY Co., LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- FAT Brain TOY Co., LLC's lead technology class is A63H (Toys, e.g. Tops, Dolls, Hoops OR Building Blocks), 12.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63H
- Ranked #31,617 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare FAT Brain TOY Co., LLC against Fasoo Co., Ltd, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 15.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.