USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

CET Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G03G (ELECTROGRAPHY; ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY; Magnetography).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, CET ranks #39,398 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 6 technology areas.

#39,398
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
45th percentile
by Innovation Score (33.6/100)
8.2
avg claims per patent
+0%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R39398 · Foreign Corporation #39,398 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
  • LOWER-Q #39,398/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH CEO Vision
  • CPC-NARROW G03G · 6 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 33.6/100
  • CLAIMS-PAR 8.2 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-FLAT +0% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: CEO Vision, Inc (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How CET’s 33.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around CET

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows CET's Innovation Score is 33.6/100 (45th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for CET?

Each dot is one of CET’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). CET’s own 8.2 claims/patent is at or below the 10.5 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

CET vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 5.96.06.066.06.06.1 5101520 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent CEO Vision, Inc - 6, 16.33CEO VisionCeres Chill Co. - 6, 10.5Ceres ChillCesign Co., Ltd. - 6, 9.83CesignCesnet, zajmove sdruzeni pravnickych osob - 6, 7.33Cesnet zajmove sd…Ceva Technologies, Ltd - 6, 17.67CevaCGS Group, LLC - 6, 18.83CGS GroupCGS Technology, LLC - 6, 6CGS TechnologyCH Biomedical (USA) Inc. - 6, 19.17CH Biomedical (US…CET Limited - 6, 8.17CET
CET vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where CET's grants concentrate

CET Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under G03G (ELECTROGRAPHY; ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY; Magnetography). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, CET sits between CEO Vision, Inc and CH Biomedical (USA) Inc..

CET's three-year grant acceleration

CET Limited shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at CET's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows CET holds 6 patents at rank #39,345, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near CET

By rank, the assignees closest to #39,345 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G03G (Electrography)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in CET's primary technology class.

CET's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

34 45th percentile higher than 45% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.533.5 201820212024 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
CET Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2018 3 50.0%
2021 1 16.7%
2024 2 33.3%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

CET Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • CET Limited's lead technology class is G03G (ELECTROGRAPHY; ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY; Magnetography), 33.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G03G
  • Ranked #39,398 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare CET Limited against CEO Vision, Inc, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 33.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.