USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Cesnet, zajmove sdruzeni pravnickych osob

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04B (Transmission).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Cesnet ranks #39,397 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 8 technology areas.

#39,397
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
8th percentile
by Innovation Score (21.1/100)
7.3
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R39397 · Foreign Corporation #39,397 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
  • LOWER-Q #39,397/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Cenx
  • CPC-NARROW H04B · 8 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 21.1/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 7.3 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cenx, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Cesnet’s 21.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cesnet

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Cesnet's Innovation Score is 21.1/100 (8th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cesnet?

Each dot is one of Cesnet’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cesnet’s own 7.3 claims/patent is at or below the 10.5 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Cesnet vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 5.96.06.066.06.06.1 51015202530 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Cenx, Inc. - 6, 24.5CenxCEO Vision, Inc - 6, 16.33CEO VisionCeres Chill Co. - 6, 10.5Ceres ChillCesign Co., Ltd. - 6, 9.83CesignCET Limited - 6, 8.17CETCeva Technologies, Ltd - 6, 17.67CevaCGS Group, LLC - 6, 18.83CGS GroupCGS Technology, LLC - 6, 6CGS TechnologyCesnet, zajmove sdruzeni pravnickych osob - 6, 7.33Cesnet zajmove sd…
Cesnet vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Cesnet's grants concentrate

Cesnet, zajmove sdruzeni pravnickych osob is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under H04B (Transmission). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Cesnet sits between Cenx, Inc. and CGS Technology, LLC.

Who files at Cesnet's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Cesnet holds 6 patents at rank #39,344, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Cesnet

By rank, the assignees closest to #39,344 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04B (Transmission)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cesnet's primary technology class.

Cesnet's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

21 8th percentile higher than 8% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.5 20152016201720182019 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Cesnet, zajmove sdruzeni pravnickych osob patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 16.7%
2016 1 16.7%
2017 1 16.7%
2018 2 33.3%
2019 1 16.7%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Cesnet, zajmove sdruzeni pravnickych osob's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Cesnet, zajmove sdruzeni pravnickych osob's lead technology class is H04B (Transmission), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04B
  • Ranked #39,397 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Cesnet, zajmove sdruzeni pravnickych osob against Cenx, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 21.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.