USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Ceravision Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01J (Electric Discharge Tubes OR Discharge Lamps).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Ceravision ranks #22,361 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 8 technology areas.

#22,361
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
31st percentile
by Innovation Score (29.7/100)
18.0
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R22361 · Foreign Corporation #22,361 · 12 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
  • MID-PACK #22,361/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Celtaxsys
  • CPC-NARROW H01J · 8 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 29.7/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 18.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Celtaxsys, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Ceravision’s 29.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Ceravision

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Ceravision's Innovation Score is 29.7/100 (31st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Ceravision?

Each dot is one of Ceravision’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Ceravision’s own 18.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Ceravision vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 11.911.91212.1 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Celtaxsys, Inc. - 12, 14.58CeltaxsysCemeCon AG - 12, 22.33CemeconCenter for Quantitative Cytometry - 12, 18.25Center for Quanti…Century Products, Inc. - 12, 2.5Century ProductsCerfe Labs, Inc. - 12, 18.83Cerfe LabsCeribell, Inc. - 12, 28CeribellCertify Global Inc. - 12, 14.75Certify GlobalCervos Medical LLC - 12, 14.25Cervos MedicalCeravision Limited - 12, 18Ceravision
Ceravision vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Ceravision's grants concentrate

Ceravision Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 91.7% of grants classified under H01J (Electric Discharge Tubes OR Discharge Lamps). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Ceravision sits between Celtaxsys, Inc. and Cervos Medical LLC.

Who files at Ceravision's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Ceravision holds 12 patents at rank #22,399, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Ceravision

By rank, the assignees closest to #22,399 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H01J (Electric Discharge Tubes OR Discharge Lamps)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Ceravision's primary technology class.

Ceravision's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

30 31st percentile higher than 31% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0123456 2015201620182019 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Ceravision Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 5 41.7%
2016 5 41.7%
2018 1 8.3%
2019 1 8.3%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Ceravision Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ceravision Limited's lead technology class is H01J (Electric Discharge Tubes OR Discharge Lamps), 91.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01J
  • Ranked #22,361 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Ceravision Limited against Celtaxsys, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 29.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.