USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 33 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Cell ranks #9,468 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 33 patents across 10 technology areas.

#9,468
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 47%
by Innovation Score (36.4/100)
14.7
avg claims per patent
-35%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R9468 · US Corporation #9,468 · 33 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 33 grants
  • UPPER-Q #9,468/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Brooks Sports
  • CPC-FOCUS G01N · 10 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 36.4/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 14.7 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DOWN -35% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Brooks Sports, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Cell’s 36.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cell

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Cell's Innovation Score is 36.4/100 (top 47% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cell?

Each dot is one of Cell’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cell’s own 14.7 claims/patent is at or below the 18.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Cell vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 32.933.033.03333.033.033.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Brooks Sports, Inc. - 33, 4.7Brooks SportsC3.ai, Inc. - 33, 23.94C3 aiCapitalbio Corporation - 33, 20.18CapitalbioCarl Zeiss X-ray Microscopy, Inc. - 33, 21.21Carl Zeiss X-ray…Center FOR Advanced Meta-materials - 33, 11.21Center FOR Advanc…Clexio Biosciences Ltd. - 33, 19.48Clexio BiosciencesCrimson Consulting Limited - 33, 18Crimson ConsultingCrrc Qingdao Sifang Rolling Stock Research Institute Co., Ltd. - 33, 11.85Crrc Qingdao Sifa…Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. - 33, 14.73Cell Signaling Te…
Cell vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Cell's grants concentrate

Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 78.8% of grants classified under G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2023. By volume, Cell sits between Brooks Sports, Inc. and Crrc Qingdao Sifang Rolling Stock Research Institute Co., Ltd..

Cell's three-year grant acceleration

Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 8 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Cell's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Cell holds 33 patents at rank #9,467, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Cell

By rank, the assignees closest to #9,467 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cell's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Cell, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their…), Cell ranks #569 of 7,863 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Cell's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

36 Top 47% higher than 53% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

02468 20152016201720182020202120222023 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 5 15.2%
2016 6 18.2%
2017 4 12.1%
2018 5 15.2%
2020 5 15.2%
2021 3 9.1%
2022 4 12.1%
2023 1 3.0%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.'s lead technology class is G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties), 78.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01N
  • Ranked #9,468 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. against Brooks Sports, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 36.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.