Overall rank by patents
#5,350
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 64 granted patents across 25 technology areas, active 2019–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61K (PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES).
The verdict
Canopy holds 64 US patents across 25 technology areas, rank #5,350 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Canopy Growth Corporation has been granted 64 US utility patents between 2019 and 2025, placing Canopy Growth Corporation at rank #5,350 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 25 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 11.3 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61K (PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES). As a Foreign Corporation, Canopy Growth Corporation is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Canopy sits between Beijing University Of Chemical Technology (64 patents, rank #5,346) and Detnet South Africa (pty) Ltd (64 patents, rank #5,354) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 43.3/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 62 grants, compared with 2 in the 2015–2019 window, a +3000% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Canopy Growth Corporation's 11.3 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while a multi-domain presence across 25 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Canopy Growth Corporation against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Beijing University of Chemical Technology
64 patents
Beijing Xiaomi Pinecone Electronics Co., Ltd.
64 patents
Bradley Company, LLC
64 patents
CalAmp Corp
64 patents
Capsugel Belgium NV
64 patents
Continental Autonomous Mobility US, LLC
64 patents
D2S, Inc.
64 patents
DETNET SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD
64 patents
Canopy Growth Corporation
64 patents
What this shows Canopy holds 64 patents at rank #5,350, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #5,350 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Canopy's primary technology class.
Canopy's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
43 Top 28% higher than 72% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2 | 3.1% |
| 2020 | 11 | 17.2% |
| 2021 | 22 | 34.4% |
| 2022 | 12 | 18.8% |
| 2023 | 6 | 9.4% |
| 2024 | 5 | 7.8% |
| 2025 | 6 | 9.4% |
Top 15 of 25 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#5,350
Across all tracked assignees
43.3 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Canopy's 64 grants land it in the top 28% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.