Overall rank by patents
#2,586
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record — 150 granted patents across 34 technology areas, active 2020–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B41J (TYPEWRITERS; SELECTIVE PRINTING MECHANISMS, i.e. MECHANISMS PRINTING OTHERWISE THAN FROM A FORME; CORRECTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS).
The verdict
CANON holds 150 US patents across 34 technology areas — rank #2,586 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
CANON PRODUCTION PRINTING HOLDING B.V. has been granted 150 US utility patents between 2020 and 2025, placing CANON PRODUCTION PRINTING HOLDING B.V. at rank #2,586 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 34 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 13.5 claims per patent with primary concentration in B41J (TYPEWRITERS; SELECTIVE PRINTING MECHANISMS, i.e. MECHANISMS PRINTING OTHERWISE THAN FROM A FORME; CORRECTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS). As a Foreign Corporation, CANON PRODUCTION PRINTING HOLDING B.V. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. The composite Innovation Score of 54.3/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2020 through 2025, with 150 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. CANON PRODUCTION PRINTING HOLDING B.V.'s 13.5 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 34 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark CANON PRODUCTION PRINTING HOLDING B.V. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus the largest corporate holders — this company marked ◀
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
106,890 patents
International Business Machines Corporation
72,926 patents
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
34,378 patents
LG ELECTRONICS INC.
32,607 patents
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LTD.
31,041 patents
Apple Inc.
30,560 patents
QUALCOMM Incorporated
30,354 patents
Intel Corporation
27,498 patents
CANON PRODUCTION PRINTING HOLDING B.V.
150 patents
What this shows CANON holds 150 patents — placing it at rank #2,586 overall, well behind the volume leaders but ahead of the tens of thousands of smaller assignees in the dataset.
CANON's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
54 Top 8% higher than 92% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView — PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 23 | 15.3% |
| 2021 | 36 | 24.0% |
| 2022 | 29 | 19.3% |
| 2023 | 24 | 16.0% |
| 2024 | 20 | 13.3% |
| 2025 | 18 | 12.0% |
Top 15 of 34 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#2,586
Across all tracked assignees
54.3 out of 100
CANON PRODUCTION PRINTING HOLDING B.V.'s primary CPC class — all holders and yearly trends
See where CANON PRODUCTION PRINTING HOLDING B.V. ranks among the largest US patent assignees
Browse every CPC technology area by patent activity
The four dimensions behind the Innovation Score
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.