Overall rank by patents
#4,871
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 71 granted patents across 30 technology areas, active 2016–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: H04W (WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS).
The verdict
Cambridge holds 71 US patents across 30 technology areas, rank #4,871 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Cambridge Mobile Telematics Inc. has been granted 71 US utility patents between 2016 and 2025, placing Cambridge Mobile Telematics Inc. at rank #4,871 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 30 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 20.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in H04W (WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS). As a US Corporation, Cambridge Mobile Telematics Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Cambridge sits between Bedford Industries, Inc. (71 patents, rank #4,867) and Engel Austria Gmbh (71 patents, rank #4,875) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 66.4/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 63 grants, compared with 8 in the 2015–2019 window, a +688% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Cambridge Mobile Telematics Inc.'s 20.4 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while a multi-domain presence across 30 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Cambridge Mobile Telematics Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Bedford Industries, Inc.
71 patents
Blast Motion Inc.
71 patents
Bunn-O-Matic Corporation
71 patents
CHANGZHOU PATENT ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD
71 patents
Clarius Mobile Health Corp.
71 patents
CompoSecure, LLC
71 patents
Domo, Inc.
71 patents
ENGEL AUSTRIA GMBH
71 patents
Cambridge Mobile Telematics Inc.
71 patents
What this shows Cambridge holds 71 patents at rank #4,871, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #4,871 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cambridge's primary technology class.
Cambridge's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
66 Top 1% higher than 99% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 1.4% |
| 2017 | 2 | 2.8% |
| 2018 | 2 | 2.8% |
| 2019 | 3 | 4.2% |
| 2020 | 4 | 5.6% |
| 2021 | 6 | 8.5% |
| 2022 | 12 | 16.9% |
| 2023 | 9 | 12.7% |
| 2024 | 21 | 29.6% |
| 2025 | 11 | 15.5% |
Top 15 of 30 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#4,871
Across all tracked assignees
66.4 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Cambridge's 71 grants land it in the top 1% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.