C2N Diagnostics
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, C2N ranks #45,409 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #45,409
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 8th percentile
- by Innovation Score (21.4/100)
- 11.0
- avg claims per patent
- -67%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R45409 · US Corporation #45,409 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #45,409/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH C2a-sec
- CPC-NARROW G01N · 6 areas
- INNOV-THIN 21.4/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 11.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -67% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: C2a-sec, Ltd (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How C2N’s 21.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around C2N
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- C2N Diagnostics · this assignee 21
C2N Diagnostics · this assignee
21 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows C2N's Innovation Score is 21.4/100 (8th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for C2N?
Each dot is one of C2N’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). C2N’s own 11.0 claims/patent is at or below the 15.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where C2N's grants concentrate
C2N Diagnostics is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, C2N sits between C.E. Niehoff & Co. and C7 Sugar GMBH.
Who files at C2N's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- C E Niehoff &
C.E. Niehoff & Co.
5 patents
- C M T Utensili S…
C.M.T. Utensili S.P.A.
5 patents
- C P Medical
C.P. Medical Corporation
5 patents
- C2a-sec
C2a-sec, Ltd
5 patents
- C3 Jian
C3 Jian, LLC
5 patents
- C360
C360 Technologies, Inc.
5 patents
- C4 Carbides
C4 Carbides Limited
5 patents
- C7 Sugar
C7 Sugar GMBH
5 patents
- C2N Diagnostics ◀
C2N Diagnostics
5 patents
What this shows C2N holds 5 patents at rank #45,419, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near C2N
By rank, the assignees closest to #45,419 in granted patent volume.
- C.E. Niehoff & Co. #45,415 · 5 patents
- C.M.T. Utensili S.P.A. #45,416 · 5 patents
- C.P. Medical Corporation #45,417 · 5 patents
- C2a-sec, Ltd #45,418 · 5 patents
- C3 Jian, LLC #45,420 · 5 patents
- C360 Technologies, Inc. #45,421 · 5 patents
- C4 Carbides Limited #45,422 · 5 patents
- C7 Sugar GMBH #45,423 · 5 patents
Leaders in G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in C2N's primary technology class.
- The Regents of the University of California 1,153 in class
- Shimadzu Corporation 1,111 in class
- Saudi Arabian OIL Company 837 in class
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. 816 in class
- The Boeing Company 701 in class
- General Electric Company 634 in class
- Kla-tencor Corporation 583 in class
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology 530 in class
C2N's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
21 8th percentile higher than 8% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does C2N Diagnostics patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
C2N Diagnostics's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- C2N Diagnostics's lead technology class is G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01N
- Ranked #45,409 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare C2N Diagnostics against C.E. Niehoff & Co., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 21.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.