Overall rank by patents
#45,419
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 6 technology areas, active 2018–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G01N (INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES).
The verdict
C2N holds 5 US patents across 6 technology areas, rank #45,419 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
C2N Diagnostics has been granted 5 US utility patents between 2018 and 2025, placing C2N Diagnostics at rank #45,419 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 6 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 11.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in G01N (INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES). As a US Corporation, C2N Diagnostics is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, C2N sits between C.e. Niehoff & Co. (5 patents, rank #45,415) and C7 Sugar Gmbh (5 patents, rank #45,423) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 21.4/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 2 grants, compared with 3 in the 2015–2019 window, a -33% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. C2N Diagnostics's 11.0 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 6 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark C2N Diagnostics against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
C.E. Niehoff & Co.
5 patents
C.M.T. UTENSILI S.P.A.
5 patents
C.P. Medical Corporation
5 patents
C2A-SEC, LTD
5 patents
C3 Jian, LLC
5 patents
C360 Technologies, Inc.
5 patents
C4 Carbides Limited
5 patents
C7 SUGAR GMBH
5 patents
C2N Diagnostics
5 patents
What this shows C2N holds 5 patents at rank #45,419, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #45,419 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in C2N's primary technology class.
C2N's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
21 Top 92% higher than 8% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2025 | 1 | 20.0% |
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#45,419
Across all tracked assignees
21.4 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
C2N's 5 grants land it in the top 92% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.