Where does C.E. Niehoff & Co. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), C.E. Niehoff & Co. ranks #45,517 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does C.E. Niehoff & Co. hold?

C.E. Niehoff & Co. holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2025, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is C.E. Niehoff & Co.'s Innovation Score?

C.E. Niehoff & Co. has an Innovation Score of 30.4 out of 100 (34th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is C.E. Niehoff & Co.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

C.E. Niehoff & Co.'s recent grant velocity is +0% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for C.E. Niehoff & Co.'s patents?

C.E. Niehoff & Co.'s patents average 16.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the C.E. Niehoff & Co. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

C.E. Niehoff & Co.

Q: What technology areas does C.E. Niehoff & Co. focus on?

C.E. Niehoff & Co.'s top technology area is H02J (Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy) with 2 patents, ranking #1,560 of 3,143 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H02J (Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, C.e. ranks #45,517 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 5 technology areas.

#45,517
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 34th percentile
by Innovation Score (30.4/100): 16.0
avg claims per patent: +0%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R45517 · US Corporation #45,517 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #45,517/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH C-ling
CPC-NARROW H02J · 5 areas
INNOV-THIN 30.4/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-FLAT +0% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: C-ling Limited (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How C.e.’s 30.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (20%) Velocity 6.7 pts (22%) Breadth 7.9 pts (26%) Claim depth 9.6 pts (32%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
C E Niehoff & · this assignee

30
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows C.e.'s Innovation Score is 30.4/100 (34th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for C.e.?

Each dot is one of C.e.’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). C.e.’s own 16.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

C.e. vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where C.e.'s grants concentrate

C.E. Niehoff & Co. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 40% of grants classified under H02J (Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy). By volume, C.e. sits between C-ling Limited and C2N Diagnostics.

C.e.'s three-year grant acceleration

C.E. Niehoff & Co. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

C-ling

5
C-M GLO

5
C-slide Holdings

5
C D Great Furnitu…

5
C M T Utensili S…

5
C P Medical

5
C2a-sec

5
C2N Diagnostics

5
C E Niehoff & ◀

5

What this shows C.E. holds 5 patents at rank #45,415, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near CE

By rank, the assignees closest to #45,415 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H02J (Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distribu…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in CE's primary technology class.

C.e.'s Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

30 34th percentile higher than 34% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

C.E. Niehoff & Co. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	1	20.0%
2018	1	20.0%
2020	1	20.0%
2023	1	20.0%
2025partial year	1	20.0%

Which technologies does C.E. Niehoff & Co. patent most?

H02J - Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy 2

H02K - Dynamo-electric Machines 1

H02P - Control OR Regulation OF Electric Motors, Electric Generators OR Dynamo-electric CONVERTERS; Controlling Transformers, Reactors OR Choke Coils 1

Y02T - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Transportation 1

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 1

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

C.E. Niehoff & Co.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

C.E. Niehoff & Co.'s lead technology class is H02J (Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy), 40% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H02J
Ranked #45,517 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare C.E. Niehoff & Co. against C-ling Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 30.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.