Overall rank by patents
#2,378
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 164 granted patents across 24 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: H10H (INORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES HAVING POTENTIAL BARRIERS).
The verdict
Bridgelux holds 164 US patents across 24 technology areas, rank #2,378 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Bridgelux, Inc. has been granted 164 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Bridgelux, Inc. at rank #2,378 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 24 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 18.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in H10H (INORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES HAVING POTENTIAL BARRIERS). As a US Corporation, Bridgelux, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Bridgelux sits between MESO Scale Technologies, Llc. (165 patents, rank #2,374) and NIO Technology (anhui) Co., Ltd (164 patents, rank #2,382) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 51.3/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 68 grants, compared with 96 in the 2015–2019 window, a -29% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Bridgelux, Inc.'s 18.6 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 24 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Bridgelux, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
MESO SCALE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.
165 patents
PING AN TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD.
165 patents
SOLiD, INC.
165 patents
AMOGREENTECH CO., LTD.
164 patents
FAURECIA Sièges d'Automobile
164 patents
LIVEPERSON, INC.
164 patents
Mettler-Toledo GmbH
164 patents
NIO TECHNOLOGY (ANHUI) CO., LTD
164 patents
Bridgelux, Inc.
164 patents
What this shows Bridgelux holds 164 patents at rank #2,378, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #2,378 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Bridgelux's primary technology class.
Bridgelux's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
51 Top 12% higher than 88% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 20 | 12.2% |
| 2016 | 26 | 15.9% |
| 2017 | 18 | 11.0% |
| 2018 | 15 | 9.1% |
| 2019 | 17 | 10.4% |
| 2020 | 12 | 7.3% |
| 2021 | 13 | 7.9% |
| 2022 | 12 | 7.3% |
| 2023 | 11 | 6.7% |
| 2024 | 10 | 6.1% |
| 2025 | 10 | 6.1% |
Top 15 of 24 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#2,378
Across all tracked assignees
51.3 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Bridgelux's 164 grants land it in the top 12% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.