Where does Bomag GmbH rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Bomag GmbH ranks #2,178 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Bomag GmbH hold?

Bomag GmbH holds 180 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 50 technology areas.

What is Bomag GmbH's Innovation Score?

Bomag GmbH has an Innovation Score of 53.3 out of 100 (top 9% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Bomag GmbH's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Bomag GmbH's recent grant velocity is -39% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Bomag GmbH's patents?

Bomag GmbH's patents average 11.3 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Bomag GmbH patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Bomag GmbH

Q: What technology areas does Bomag GmbH focus on?

Bomag GmbH's top technology area is E01C (Construction OF, OR Surfaces FOR, Roads, Sports Grounds, OR THE LIKE; Machines OR Auxiliary Tools FOR Construction OR Repair) with 111 patents, ranking #3 of 311 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 50 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 180 granted patents across 50 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E01C (Construction OF, OR Surfaces FOR, Roads, Sports Grounds, OR THE LIKE; Machines OR Auxiliary Tools FOR Construction OR Repair).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Bomag ranks #2,178 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 180 patents across 50 technology areas.

#2,178
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 9%
by Innovation Score (53.3/100): 11.3
avg claims per patent: -39%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R2178 · Foreign Corporation #2,178 · 180 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MID 180 grants
TOP-DECILE #2,178/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH 3shape A/S
CPC-WIDE E01C · 50 areas
INNOV-PAR 53.3/100
CLAIMS-PAR 11.3 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DOWN -39% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: 3shape A/S (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Bomag’s 53.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 18.0 pts (34%) Velocity 3.6 pts (7%) Breadth 25.0 pts (47%) Claim depth 6.8 pts (13%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Bausch & Lomb… · near

53
Bomag · this assignee

53
Shindengen Electric… · near

53
TetraMem · near

53
Wabash National · near

53
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Bomag's Innovation Score is 53.3/100 (top 9% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Bomag?

Each dot is one of Bomag’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Bomag’s own 11.3 claims/patent is at or below the 13.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Bomag vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

How Bomag's grant cadence moved

Between 2020–2024, Bomag GmbH received 68 grants versus 111 in 2015–2019 (-39% equal-window velocity, below median growth). Across complete PatentsView years, output peaked in 2020 at 29 grants and bottomed in 2022 at 3. Lead class E01C accounts for 61.7% of the portfolio across 50 subclasses. Volume neighbours: Mentor Acquisition One, LLC (#2,174) and GIESECKE+DEVRIENT Currency Technology GMBH (#2,182).

Bomag's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Bomag GmbH moved from 59 to 32 grants (0.54x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #2,588. See the growth leaderboard.

Mentor Acquisitio…

181
Piaggio & C SPA

181
The Sherwin-willi…

181
3shape A/S

180
Dowa Materials

180
DRÄGER Safety & K…

180
Delavan

180
Giesecke+Devrient…

180
Bomag ◀

180

What this shows Bomag holds 180 patents at rank #2,178, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Bomag

By rank, the assignees closest to #2,178 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in E01C (Construction OF)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Bomag's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Bomag, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In E01C (Construction OF), Bomag ranks #3 of 311 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (53 here).

Shindengen Electric Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 53 Wabash National, L.P. 53 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated 53 TetraMem Inc. 53

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (11.3 here).

Denso Wave Incorporated 11.3 avg Medela Holding AG 11.3 avg DOW Global Technologies LLC 11.3 avg Biotix, Inc. 11.3 avg

Bomag's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

53 Top 9% higher than 91% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Bomag GmbH patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	23	12.8%
2016	21	11.7%
2017	18	10.0%
2018	26	14.4%
2019	23	12.8%
2020	29	16.1%
2021	7	3.9%
2022	3	1.7%
2023	15	8.3%
2024	14	7.8%
2025partial year	1	0.6%

Which technologies does Bomag GmbH patent most?

E01C - Construction OF, OR Surfaces FOR, Roads, Sports Grounds, OR THE LIKE; Machines OR Auxiliary Tools FOR Construction OR Repair 111

B62D - Motor VEHICLES; Trailers 18

E02D - FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; Embankments ; Underground OR Underwater Structures 17

E21C - Mining OR Quarrying 15

B60G - Vehicle Suspension Arrangements 10

C23C - Coating Metallic MATERIAL; Coating Material With Metallic MATERIAL; Surface Treatment OF Metallic Material BY Diffusion Into THE Surface, BY Chemical Conversion OR SUBSTITUTION; Coating BY Vacuum Evaporation, BY Sputtering, BY ION Implantation OR BY Chemical Vapour Deposition, IN General 6

F16H - Gearing 6

B60Y - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Aspects Cross-cutting Vehicle Technology 6

E02F - DREDGING; Soil-shifting 5

B60P - Vehicles Adapted FOR Load Transportation OR TO Transport, TO Carry, OR TO Comprise Special Loads OR Objects 5

B28D - Working Stone OR Stone-like Materials 5

B60K - Arrangement OR Mounting OF Propulsion Units OR OF Transmissions IN VEHICLES; Arrangement OR Mounting OF Plural Diverse Prime-movers IN VEHICLES; Auxiliary Drives FOR VEHICLES; Instrumentation OR Dashboards FOR VEHICLES; Arrangements IN Connection With Cooling, AIR Intake, GAS Exhaust OR Fuel Supply 5

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 4

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 4

B05B - Spraying APPARATUS; Atomising APPARATUS; Nozzles 4

Top 15 of 50 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Bomag GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Bomag GmbH's lead technology class is E01C (Construction OF, OR Surfaces FOR, Roads, Sports Grounds, OR THE LIKE; Machines OR Auxiliary Tools FOR Construction OR Repair), 61.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E01C
Ranked #2,178 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Bomag GmbH against Mentor Acquisition One, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 53.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.