Where does Blade Dynamics Limited rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Blade Dynamics Limited ranks #6,877 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Blade Dynamics Limited hold?

Blade Dynamics Limited holds 48 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 20 technology areas.

What is Blade Dynamics Limited's Innovation Score?

Blade Dynamics Limited has an Innovation Score of 59.1 out of 100 (top 4% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Blade Dynamics Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Blade Dynamics Limited's recent grant velocity is +57% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Blade Dynamics Limited's patents?

Blade Dynamics Limited's patents average 16.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Blade Dynamics Limited patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Blade Dynamics Limited

Q: What technology areas does Blade Dynamics Limited focus on?

Blade Dynamics Limited's top technology area is Y02E (Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution) with 44 patents, ranking #336 of 5,963 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 20 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 48 granted patents across 20 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: Y02E (Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Blade ranks #6,877 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 48 patents across 20 technology areas.

#6,877
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 4%
by Innovation Score (59.1/100): 16.4
avg claims per patent: +57%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R6877 · Foreign Corporation #6,877 · 48 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 48 grants
UPPER-Q #6,877/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH AutoConnect Holdings
CPC-FOCUS Y02E · 20 areas
INNOV-PAR 59.1/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.4 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +57% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: AutoConnect Holdings LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Blade’s 59.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 13.4 pts (23%) Velocity 20.0 pts (34%) Breadth 15.8 pts (27%) Claim depth 9.9 pts (17%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Blade Dynamics · this assignee

59
Inteva Products · near

59
Kostal Automobil… · near

59
Politecnico di Milano · near

59
Carlsmed · near

59
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Blade's Innovation Score is 59.1/100 (top 4% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Blade?

Each dot is one of Blade’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Blade’s own 16.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Blade vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Blade's grants concentrate

Blade Dynamics Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 20 CPC subclasses with 91.7% of grants classified under Y02E (Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (17 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Blade sits between AutoConnect Holdings LLC and BruMate, Inc..

Blade's three-year grant acceleration

Blade Dynamics Limited shows 21 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Autoconnect Holdi…

48
Beijing Summer Sp…

48
Beneq OY

48
Bioneer

48
Buck Institute FO…

48
Beijing Jiaotong…

48
Benson Hill Seeds

48
Brumate

48
Blade Dynamics ◀

48

What this shows Blade holds 48 patents at rank #6,875, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Blade

By rank, the assignees closest to #6,875 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in Y02E (Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Blade's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Blade, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In Y02E (Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions), Blade ranks #336 of 5,963 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (59 here).

Politecnico di Milano 59 Kostal Automobil Elektrik GmbH & Co. KG 59 Inteva Products, LLC 59 Carlsmed, Inc. 59

Blade's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

59 Top 4% higher than 96% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Blade Dynamics Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	4.2%
2016	1	2.1%
2017	2	4.2%
2018	4	8.3%
2019	5	10.4%
2020	1	2.1%
2022	2	4.2%
2023	2	4.2%
2024	17	35.4%
2025partial year	12	25.0%

Which technologies does Blade Dynamics Limited patent most?

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 44

F03D - Wind Motors 42

F05B - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Wind, Spring, Weight, Inertia OR Like Motors, TO Machines OR Engines FOR Liquids Covered BY Subclasses F03b, F03d AND F03g 41

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 34

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 24

B29L - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c, Relating TO Particular Articles 22

B29D - Producing Particular Articles From Plastics OR From Substances IN A Plastic State 18

B29K - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses B29b, B29c OR B29d, Relating TO Moulding Materials OR TO Materials FOR ; Moulds, ; Reinforcements, Fillers OR Preformed Parts, e.g. Inserts 12

B32B - Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form 6

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 5

F05C - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Materials, Material Properties OR Material Characteristics FOR Machines, Engines OR Pumps Other Than Non-positive-displacement Machines OR Engines 3

F05D - Indexing Scheme FOR Aspects Relating TO Non-positive-displacement Machines OR Engines, Gas-turbines OR Jet-propulsion Plants 2

E04C - Structural ELEMENTS; Building Materials 2

E04H - Buildings OR Like Structures FOR Particular PURPOSES; Swimming OR Splash Baths OR POOLS; MASTS; FENCING; Tents OR Canopies, IN General 1

F01D - Non-positive Displacement Machines OR Engines, e.g. Steam Turbines 1

Top 15 of 20 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Blade Dynamics Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Blade Dynamics Limited's lead technology class is Y02E (Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution), 91.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore Y02E
Ranked #6,877 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Blade Dynamics Limited against AutoConnect Holdings LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 59.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.