Where does BioCut, LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), BioCut, LLC ranks #39,117 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does BioCut, LLC hold?

BioCut, LLC holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2024, spanning 6 technology areas.

What is BioCut, LLC's Innovation Score?

BioCut, LLC has an Innovation Score of 20.8 out of 100 (8th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does BioCut, LLC focus on?

BioCut, LLC's top technology area is B26F (PERFORATING; PUNCHING; CUTTING-OUT; STAMPING-OUT; Severing BY Means Other Than Cutting) with 1 patents, ranking #119 of 252 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 6 CPC subclasses total.

Is BioCut, LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

BioCut, LLC's recent grant velocity is +100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for BioCut, LLC's patents?

BioCut, LLC's patents average 3.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the BioCut, LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

BioCut, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B26F (PERFORATING; PUNCHING; CUTTING-OUT; STAMPING-OUT; Severing BY Means Other Than Cutting).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Biocut ranks #39,117 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 6 technology areas.

#39,117
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 8th percentile
by Innovation Score (20.8/100): 3.5
avg claims per patent: +100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R39117 · US Corporation #39,117 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #39,117/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Big Sky Financial
CPC-NARROW B26F · 6 areas
INNOV-THIN 20.8/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 3.5 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Big Sky Financial Corporation (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Biocut’s 20.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (32%) Velocity 3.3 pts (16%) Breadth 8.7 pts (42%) Claim depth 2.1 pts (10%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
BioCut · this assignee

21
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Biocut's Innovation Score is 20.8/100 (8th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Biocut?

Each dot is one of Biocut’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Biocut’s own 3.5 claims/patent is at or below the 14.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Biocut vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Biocut's grants concentrate

BioCut, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 16.7% of grants classified under B26F (PERFORATING; PUNCHING; CUTTING-OUT; STAMPING-OUT; Severing BY Means Other Than Cutting). By volume, Biocut sits between Big Sky Financial Corporation and BioSpecifics Technologies LLC.

Biocut's three-year grant acceleration

BioCut, LLC shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Big Sky Financial

6
Bill Thomas Assoc…

6
Bilz Werkzeugfabr…

6
Bing Innovations…

6
Biofluid Technolo…

6
Biogenware

6
Bioreference Heal…

6
Biospecifics

6
Biocut ◀

6

What this shows BioCut holds 6 patents at rank #39,198, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near BioCut

By rank, the assignees closest to #39,198 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B26F (Perforating)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in BioCut's primary technology class.

Biocut's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

21 8th percentile higher than 8% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

BioCut, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	2	33.3%
2021	2	33.3%
2024	2	33.3%

Which technologies does BioCut, LLC patent most?

B26F - PERFORATING; PUNCHING; CUTTING-OUT; STAMPING-OUT; Severing BY Means Other Than Cutting 1

B31B - Making Containers OF Paper, Cardboard OR Material Worked IN A Manner Analogous TO Paper 1

B26D - CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing 1

B21D - Working OR Processing OF Sheet Metal OR Metal Tubes, Rods OR Profiles Without Essentially Removing MATERIAL; Punching Metal 1

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 1

B23P - Metal-working NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Combined OPERATIONS; Universal Machine Tools 1

Top 6 of 6 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

BioCut, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

BioCut, LLC's lead technology class is B26F (PERFORATING; PUNCHING; CUTTING-OUT; STAMPING-OUT; Severing BY Means Other Than Cutting), 16.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B26F
Ranked #39,117 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare BioCut, LLC against Big Sky Financial Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 20.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.