Overall rank by patents
#8,988
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation
Binder Gmbh
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 35 granted patents across 30 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: C04B (LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE ; CERAMICS ; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE).
35
Total patents granted
30
CPC technology areas
12.8
Avg claims per patent
+92%
5-year filing velocity
The verdict
Binder holds 35 US patents across 30 technology areas, rank #8,988 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
- #8,988
- of 50,000 US assignees by volume
- Top 22%
- by Innovation Score (46.1/100)
- 12.8
- avg claims per patent
- +92%
- filing velocity, last 5 yrs
Portfolio overview
Binder GmbH has been granted 35 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Binder GmbH at rank #8,988 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 30 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 12.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in C04B (LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE ; CERAMICS ; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE). As a Foreign Corporation, Binder GmbH is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. The composite Innovation Score of 46.1/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 23 grants, compared with 12 in the 2015–2019 window, a +92% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Binder GmbH's 12.8 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 30 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Binder GmbH against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
How does Binder compare?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus the largest corporate holders, this company marked ◀
- Samsung
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
106,890 patents
- International Bus…
International Business Machines Corporation
72,926 patents
- Canon 34,378
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
34,378 patents
- LG 32,607
LG ELECTRONICS INC.
32,607 patents
- Taiwan Semiconduc… 31,041
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LTD.
31,041 patents
- Apple 30,560
Apple Inc.
30,560 patents
- Qualcomm Incorpor… 30,354
QUALCOMM Incorporated
30,354 patents
- Intel 27,498
Intel Corporation
27,498 patents
- Binder ◀ 35
Binder GmbH
35 patents
What this shows Binder holds 35 patents, placing it at rank #8,988 overall, well behind the volume leaders but ahead of the tens of thousands of smaller assignees in the dataset.
Binder's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
46 Top 22% higher than 78% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 2.9% |
| 2017 | 4 | 11.4% |
| 2018 | 2 | 5.7% |
| 2019 | 5 | 14.3% |
| 2020 | 5 | 14.3% |
| 2021 | 3 | 8.6% |
| 2022 | 4 | 11.4% |
| 2023 | 5 | 14.3% |
| 2024 | 4 | 11.4% |
| 2025 | 2 | 5.7% |
Which technologies does Binder GmbH patent most?
Top 15 of 30 technology areas
Patent Moat Analysis
Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Multi-domain
Claim Depth Standard
Velocity Accelerating
Frequently Asked Questions
How many patents does Binder GmbH hold?
Binder GmbH holds 35 US granted patents filed between 2015 and 2025, spanning 30 technology areas.
What is Binder GmbH's Innovation Score?
Binder GmbH has an Innovation Score of 46.1 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Binder GmbH focus on?
Binder GmbH's top technology area is C04B (LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE ; CERAMICS ; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE) with 8 patents. The company has filed patents in 30 CPC subclasses total.
Is Binder GmbH's patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Binder GmbH's recent filing velocity is +92% compared to the prior five-year period. This indicates accelerating innovation.
What does claim depth mean for Binder GmbH's patents?
Binder GmbH's patents average 12.8 claims each. This falls within the standard range, providing solid legal coverage.
How is the Binder GmbH patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.
Learn More
How to use this portfolio
Binder's 35 grants land it in the top 22% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
- Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Binder ranks #8,988 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
- Most of this portfolio concentrates in C04B - see who else leads that technology area. C04B leaders
- Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Explore the patent dataset
C04B technology
Binder GmbH's primary CPC class, all holders and yearly trends
Top 50 patent holders
See where Binder GmbH ranks among the largest US patent assignees
All technology classes
Browse every CPC technology area by patent activity
How the score works
The four dimensions behind the Innovation Score
Related
Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Data sources used on this page
- USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
- Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
- USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov
