A.W. Chesterton Company
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 21 granted patents across 17 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16J (Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, A.w. ranks #13,876 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 21 patents across 17 technology areas.
- #13,876
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 7%
- by Innovation Score (55.6/100)
- 17.2
- avg claims per patent
- +38%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R13876 · US Corporation #13,876 · 21 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 21 grants
- MID-PACK #13,876/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH 3D Glass Solutions
- CPC-FOCUS F16J · 17 areas
- INNOV-PAR 55.6/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-UP +38% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: 3D Glass Solutions, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How A.w.’s 55.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around A.w.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- A W Chesterton · this assignee
A W Chesterton · this assignee
56 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows A.w.'s Innovation Score is 55.6/100 (top 7% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for A.w.?
Each dot is one of A.w.’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). A.w.’s own 17.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where A.w.'s grants concentrate
A.W. Chesterton Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 17 CPC subclasses with 95.2% of grants classified under F16J (Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, A.w. sits between 3D Glass Solutions, Inc. and Abov Semiconductor Co., Ltd..
A.w.'s three-year grant acceleration
A.W. Chesterton Company shows 10 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at AW's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- 3D Glass Solutions
3D Glass Solutions, Inc.
21 patents
- 3I
3I Inc.
21 patents
- 6 River Systems
6 River Systems, LLC
21 patents
- A Duda & Sons
A. Duda & Sons, Inc.
21 patents
- ABB AB
ABB AB
21 patents
- ABB Power
ABB Power Electronics Inc.
21 patents
- ABI Attachments
ABI Attachments, Inc.
21 patents
- Abov Semiconductor
Abov Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
21 patents
- A W Chesterton ◀
A.W. Chesterton Company
21 patents
What this shows A.W. holds 21 patents at rank #13,821, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near AW
By rank, the assignees closest to #13,821 in granted patent volume.
- 3D Glass Solutions, Inc. #13,817 · 21 patents
- 3I Inc. #13,818 · 21 patents
- 6 River Systems, LLC #13,819 · 21 patents
- A. Duda & Sons, Inc. #13,820 · 21 patents
- ABB AB #13,822 · 21 patents
- ABB Power Electronics Inc. #13,823 · 21 patents
- ABI Attachments, Inc. #13,824 · 21 patents
- Abov Semiconductor Co., Ltd. #13,825 · 21 patents
Leaders in F16J (Pistons)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in AW's primary technology class.
A.w.'s Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
56 Top 7% higher than 93% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 4.8% |
| 2016 | 2 | 9.5% |
| 2017 | 3 | 14.3% |
| 2019 | 2 | 9.5% |
| 2020 | 1 | 4.8% |
| 2022 | 2 | 9.5% |
| 2023 | 4 | 19.0% |
| 2024 | 4 | 19.0% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 9.5% |
Which technologies does A.W. Chesterton Company patent most?
Top 15 of 17 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
A.W. Chesterton Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- A.W. Chesterton Company's lead technology class is F16J (Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings), 95.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16J
- Ranked #13,876 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare A.W. Chesterton Company against 3D Glass Solutions, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 55.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.