Overall rank by patents
#30,951
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 24 technology areas, active 2016–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: C10L (FUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G OR C10K; LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS; USE OF ADDITIVES TO FUELS OR FIRES; FIRE-LIG).
The verdict
Avril holds 8 US patents across 24 technology areas, rank #30,951 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Avril has been granted 8 US utility patents between 2016 and 2025, placing Avril at rank #30,951 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 24 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 18.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in C10L (FUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G OR C10K; LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS; USE OF ADDITIVES TO FUELS OR FIRES; FIRE-LIG). As a Foreign Corporation, Avril is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Avril sits between Avl Technologies, Inc. (8 patents, rank #30,947) and BABY Teething Tubes L.l.c. (8 patents, rank #30,955) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 55.9/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 4 grants, compared with 4 in the 2015–2019 window, a +0% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Avril's 18.4 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 24 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Avril against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
AvL Technologies, Inc.
8 patents
Aver Technologies, Inc.
8 patents
Avista Edge, Inc.
8 patents
Avocent Corporation
8 patents
Axovant Sciences GmbH
8 patents
Azevan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
8 patents
A⋅T COMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD.
8 patents
BABY TEETHING TUBES L.L.C.
8 patents
Avril
8 patents
What this shows Avril holds 8 patents at rank #30,951, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #30,951 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Avril's primary technology class.
Avril's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
56 Top 6% higher than 94% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2017 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2018 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2019 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2022 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2025 | 1 | 12.5% |
Top 15 of 24 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#30,951
Across all tracked assignees
55.9 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Avril's 8 grants land it in the top 6% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.