Where does Architectural Mailboxes, LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Architectural Mailboxes, LLC ranks #44,808 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Architectural Mailboxes, LLC hold?

Architectural Mailboxes, LLC holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2023, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Architectural Mailboxes, LLC's Innovation Score?

Architectural Mailboxes, LLC has an Innovation Score of 31.3 out of 100 (37th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Architectural Mailboxes, LLC focus on?

Architectural Mailboxes, LLC's top technology area is A47G (Household OR Table Equipment) with 5 patents, ranking #92 of 709 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

Is Architectural Mailboxes, LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Architectural Mailboxes, LLC's recent grant velocity is -75% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Architectural Mailboxes, LLC's patents?

Architectural Mailboxes, LLC's patents average 19.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Architectural Mailboxes, LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Architectural Mailboxes, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47G (Household OR Table Equipment).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Architectural ranks #44,808 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 4 technology areas.

#44,808
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 37th percentile
by Innovation Score (31.3/100): 19.0
avg claims per patent: -75%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R44808 · US Corporation #44,808 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
LOWER-Q #44,808/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Archemix
CPC-NARROW A47G · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 31.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -75% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Archemix LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Architectural’s 31.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (20%) Velocity 6.7 pts (21%) Breadth 7.1 pts (23%) Claim depth 11.4 pts (36%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Architectural… · this assignee

31
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Architectural's Innovation Score is 31.3/100 (37th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Architectural?

Each dot is one of Architectural’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Architectural’s own 19.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Architectural vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Architectural's grants concentrate

Architectural Mailboxes, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A47G (Household OR Table Equipment). By volume, Architectural sits between Archemix LLC and Arcus Holding A/S.

Architectural's three-year grant acceleration

Architectural Mailboxes, LLC shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Archemix

5
Archer Manufactur…

5
Archi Enterprises

5
Archimedes Contro…

5
Architectural bus…

5
Arcom Digital Pat…

5
Arctop

5
Arcus Holding A/S

5
Architectural Mai… ◀

5

What this shows Architectural holds 5 patents at rank #44,921, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Architectural

By rank, the assignees closest to #44,921 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A47G (Household OR Table Equipment)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Architectural's primary technology class.

Architectural's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

31 37th percentile higher than 37% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Architectural Mailboxes, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	20.0%
2016	1	20.0%
2017	1	20.0%
2018	1	20.0%
2023	1	20.0%

Which technologies does Architectural Mailboxes, LLC patent most?

A47G - Household OR Table Equipment 5

E05B - LOCKS; Accessories THEREFOR; Handcuffs 1

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 1

B65D - Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR Fittings THEREFOR; Packaging ELEMENTS; Packages 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Architectural Mailboxes, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Architectural Mailboxes, LLC's lead technology class is A47G (Household OR Table Equipment), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47G
Ranked #44,808 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Architectural Mailboxes, LLC against Archemix LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 31.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.