Arbor Vita Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Arbor ranks #44,795 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #44,795
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 27th percentile
- by Innovation Score (28.3/100)
- 29.0
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R44795 · US Corporation #44,795 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- LOWER-Q #44,795/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH AquaBlok
- CPC-NARROW G01N · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 28.3/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 29.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: AquaBlok Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Arbor’s 28.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Arbor
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Arbor Vita · this assignee 28
Arbor Vita · this assignee
28 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Arbor's Innovation Score is 28.3/100 (27th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Arbor?
Each dot is one of Arbor’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Arbor’s own 29.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Arbor's grants concentrate
Arbor Vita Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Arbor sits between AquaBlok Ltd. and Archi Enterprises Inc..
Who files at Arbor's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Aquablok
AquaBlok Ltd.
5 patents
- Aquamira
Aquamira Technologies, Inc.
5 patents
- Aquedeon Medical
Aquedeon Medical, Inc.
5 patents
- Aquestia
Aquestia Ltd.
5 patents
- Arcelik A S
Arcelik A.S.
5 patents
- Archemix
Archemix LLC
5 patents
- Archer Manufactur…
Archer Manufacturing, Inc.
5 patents
- Archi Enterprises
Archi Enterprises Inc.
5 patents
- Arbor Vita ◀
Arbor Vita Corporation
5 patents
What this shows Arbor holds 5 patents at rank #44,915, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Arbor
By rank, the assignees closest to #44,915 in granted patent volume.
- AquaBlok Ltd. #44,911 · 5 patents
- Aquamira Technologies, Inc. #44,912 · 5 patents
- Aquedeon Medical, Inc. #44,913 · 5 patents
- Aquestia Ltd. #44,914 · 5 patents
- Arcelik A.S. #44,916 · 5 patents
- Archemix LLC #44,917 · 5 patents
- Archer Manufacturing, Inc. #44,918 · 5 patents
- Archi Enterprises Inc. #44,919 · 5 patents
Leaders in G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Arbor's primary technology class.
- The Regents of the University of California 1,153 in class
- Shimadzu Corporation 1,111 in class
- Saudi Arabian OIL Company 837 in class
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. 816 in class
- The Boeing Company 701 in class
- General Electric Company 634 in class
- Kla-tencor Corporation 583 in class
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology 530 in class
Arbor's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 27th percentile higher than 27% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2017 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Arbor Vita Corporation patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Arbor Vita Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Arbor Vita Corporation's lead technology class is G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01N
- Ranked #44,795 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Arbor Vita Corporation against AquaBlok Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 28.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.