Where does AquaBlok Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), AquaBlok Ltd. ranks #44,785 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does AquaBlok Ltd. hold?

AquaBlok Ltd. holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2021 and 2023, spanning 11 technology areas.

What is AquaBlok Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

AquaBlok Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 34.1 out of 100 (47th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does AquaBlok Ltd. focus on?

AquaBlok Ltd.'s top technology area is E02D (FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; Embankments ; Underground OR Underwater Structures) with 3 patents, ranking #146 of 430 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 11 CPC subclasses total.

Is AquaBlok Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for AquaBlok Ltd..

What does claim depth mean for AquaBlok Ltd.'s patents?

AquaBlok Ltd.'s patents average 19.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the AquaBlok Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

AquaBlok Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2021–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E02D (FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; Embankments ; Underground OR Underwater Structures).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Aquablok ranks #44,785 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 11 technology areas.

#44,785
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 47th percentile
by Innovation Score (34.1/100): 19.6
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R44785 · US Corporation #44,785 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
LOWER-Q #44,785/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Applied Energetics
CPC-FOCUS E02D · 11 areas
INNOV-THIN 34.1/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.6 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
SPAN-YRS 2021–2023 · 3y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Applied Energetics, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Aquablok’s 34.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (18%) Velocity 4.4 pts (13%) Breadth 11.7 pts (34%) Claim depth 11.8 pts (35%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
AquaBlok · this assignee

34
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Aquablok's Innovation Score is 34.1/100 (47th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Aquablok?

Each dot is one of Aquablok’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Aquablok’s own 19.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Aquablok vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Aquablok's grants concentrate

AquaBlok Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under E02D (FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; Embankments ; Underground OR Underwater Structures). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, Aquablok sits between Applied Energetics, Inc. and Arbor Vita Corporation.

Aquablok's three-year grant acceleration

AquaBlok Ltd. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Applied Energetics

5
Applied Thin Films

5
Aptarion Biotech

5
Aqua Star

5
Aquamira

5
Aquedeon Medical

5
Aquestia

5
Arbor Vita

5
Aquablok ◀

5

What this shows AquaBlok holds 5 patents at rank #44,911, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near AquaBlok

By rank, the assignees closest to #44,911 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in E02D (Foundations)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in AquaBlok's primary technology class.

Aquablok's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

34 47th percentile higher than 47% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2021–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

AquaBlok Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2021	3	60.0%
2022	1	20.0%
2023	1	20.0%

Which technologies does AquaBlok Ltd. patent most?

E02D - FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; Embankments ; Underground OR Underwater Structures 3

B09C - Reclamation OF Contaminated Soil 3

C04B - Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone 2

C02F - Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge 2

B32B - Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form 1

Y02W - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Wastewater Treatment OR Waste Management 1

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 1

E02B - Hydraulic Engineering 1

Y02A - Technologies FOR Adaptation TO Climate Change 1

E02F - DREDGING; Soil-shifting 1

B01J - Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus 1

Top 11 of 11 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

AquaBlok Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

AquaBlok Ltd.'s lead technology class is E02D (FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; Embankments ; Underground OR Underwater Structures), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E02D
Ranked #44,785 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare AquaBlok Ltd. against Applied Energetics, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 34.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.