USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Aperam

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 19 granted patents across 22 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C22C (Alloys).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Aperam ranks #15,120 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 19 patents across 22 technology areas.

#15,120
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 29%
by Innovation Score (43.2/100)
18.2
avg claims per patent
+275%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R15120 · Foreign Corporation #15,120 · 19 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 19 grants
  • MID-PACK #15,120/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Amgine (US)
  • CPC-FOCUS C22C · 22 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 43.2/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 18.2 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-SURGE +275% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Amgine Technologies (US), Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Aperam’s 43.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Aperam

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Aperam's Innovation Score is 43.2/100 (top 29% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Aperam?

Each dot is one of Aperam’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Aperam’s own 18.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Aperam vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 18.918.91919.1 05101520 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Amgine Technologies (US), Inc. - 19, 18.21Amgine (US)Anaptysbio, Inc. - 19, 18.63AnaptysbioAopen Inc. - 19, 13.42AopenAP Systems Inc. - 19, 12.11AP SystemsArbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC - 19, 14.79Arbor Pharmaceuti…Aris Horticulture, Inc. - 19, 1Aris HorticultureArtisent, LLC - 19, 2.89ArtisentASK Industries GmbH - 19, 13.58ASK IndustriesAperam - 19, 18.21Aperam
Aperam vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Aperam's grants concentrate

Aperam is a focused PatentsView assignee: 22 CPC subclasses with 68.4% of grants classified under C22C (Alloys). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Aperam sits between Amgine Technologies (US), Inc. and ASK Industries GmbH.

Aperam's three-year grant acceleration

Aperam shows 8 grants in 2022–2024 against only 10 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Aperam's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Aperam holds 19 patents at rank #15,096, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Aperam

By rank, the assignees closest to #15,096 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C22C (Alloys)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Aperam's primary technology class.

Aperam's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

43 Top 29% higher than 71% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

02468 2017201920202021202220232024 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Aperam patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2017 1 5.3%
2019 3 15.8%
2020 4 21.1%
2021 3 15.8%
2022 1 5.3%
2023 6 31.6%
2024 1 5.3%

Which technologies does Aperam patent most?

Top 15 of 22 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Aperam's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Aperam's lead technology class is C22C (Alloys), 68.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C22C
  • Ranked #15,120 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Aperam against Amgine Technologies (US), Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 43.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.