AMG Co., Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 16 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment ; Equipment FOR Cosmetics OR Cosmetic Treatments, e.g. FOR Manicuring OR Pedicuring).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, AMG ranks #17,431 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 16 patents across 10 technology areas.
- #17,431
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 14th percentile
- by Innovation Score (24.3/100)
- 5.6
- avg claims per patent
- +0%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R17431 · Foreign Corporation #17,431 · 16 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 16 grants
- MID-PACK #17,431/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Airmar Technology
- CPC-FOCUS A45D · 10 areas
- INNOV-THIN 24.3/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 5.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-FLAT +0% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Airmar Technology Corporation (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How AMG’s 24.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around AMG
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- AMG · this assignee 24
AMG · this assignee
24 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows AMG's Innovation Score is 24.3/100 (14th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for AMG?
Each dot is one of AMG’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). AMG’s own 5.6 claims/patent is at or below the 11.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where AMG's grants concentrate
AMG Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 56.3% of grants classified under A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment ; Equipment FOR Cosmetics OR Cosmetic Treatments, e.g. FOR Manicuring OR Pedicuring). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (7 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, AMG sits between Airmar Technology Corporation and Ansei Corporation.
Who files at AMG's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Airmar Technology
Airmar Technology Corporation
16 patents
- Alberee Products
Alberee Products, Inc.
16 patents
- Alltrade Tools
Alltrade Tools, LLC
16 patents
- Amcor Rigid Plast…
Amcor Rigid Plastics USA, LLC
16 patents
- AMI Entertainment…
AMI Entertainment Network, LLC
16 patents
- Amphenol LTW Tech…
Amphenol LTW Technology Co., Ltd.
16 patents
- Amsilk
Amsilk GmbH
16 patents
- Ansei
Ansei Corporation
16 patents
- AMG ◀
AMG Co., Ltd.
16 patents
What this shows AMG holds 16 patents at rank #17,412, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near AMG
By rank, the assignees closest to #17,412 in granted patent volume.
- Airmar Technology Corporation #17,408 · 16 patents
- Alberee Products, Inc. #17,409 · 16 patents
- Alltrade Tools, LLC #17,410 · 16 patents
- Amcor Rigid Plastics USA, LLC #17,411 · 16 patents
- AMI Entertainment Network, LLC #17,413 · 16 patents
- Amphenol LTW Technology Co., Ltd. #17,414 · 16 patents
- Amsilk GmbH #17,415 · 16 patents
- Ansei Corporation #17,416 · 16 patents
Leaders in A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in AMG's primary technology class.
AMG's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
24 14th percentile higher than 14% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 6.3% |
| 2017 | 1 | 6.3% |
| 2018 | 3 | 18.8% |
| 2019 | 3 | 18.8% |
| 2020 | 1 | 6.3% |
| 2021 | 7 | 43.8% |
Which technologies does AMG Co., Ltd. patent most?
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
AMG Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- AMG Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is A45D (Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment ; Equipment FOR Cosmetics OR Cosmetic Treatments, e.g. FOR Manicuring OR Pedicuring), 56.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A45D
- Ranked #17,431 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare AMG Co., Ltd. against Airmar Technology Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 24.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.