Allied Tube & Conduit Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F41H (ARMOUR; Armoured TURRETS; Armoured OR Armed VEHICLES; Means OF Attack OR Defence, e.g. Camouflage, IN General).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Allied ranks #20,714 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 10 technology areas.
- #20,714
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 18%
- by Innovation Score (47.5/100)
- 12.1
- avg claims per patent
- +600%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R20714 · US Corporation #20,714 · 13 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
- MID-PACK #20,714/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Akwel
- CPC-FOCUS F41H · 10 areas
- INNOV-PAR 47.5/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 12.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +600% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Akwel SA (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Allied’s 47.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Allied
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Allied Tube & Conduit · this assignee
Allied Tube & Conduit · this assignee
48 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Allied's Innovation Score is 47.5/100 (top 18% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Allied?
Each dot is one of Allied’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Allied’s own 12.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 6.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Allied's grants concentrate
Allied Tube & Conduit Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 46.2% of grants classified under F41H (ARMOUR; Armoured TURRETS; Armoured OR Armed VEHICLES; Means OF Attack OR Defence, e.g. Camouflage, IN General). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Allied sits between Akwel SA and Alphapointe.
Allied's three-year grant acceleration
Allied Tube & Conduit Corporation shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Allied's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Akwel
Akwel SA
13 patents
- ALD Group
ALD Group Limited
13 patents
- ALL Packaging
ALL Packaging Company LLC
13 patents
- All-logic INT
All-logic INT. Co., Ltd.
13 patents
- Almus
Almus Corp.
13 patents
- ALO
ALO, LLC
13 patents
- Alpad
Alpad Corporation
13 patents
- Alphapointe
Alphapointe
13 patents
- Allied Tube & Con… ◀
Allied Tube & Conduit Corporation
13 patents
What this shows Allied holds 13 patents at rank #20,698, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Allied
By rank, the assignees closest to #20,698 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in F41H (Armour)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Allied's primary technology class.
- United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air Force 91 in class
- Axon Enterprise, Inc. 83 in class
- Oshkosh Defense, LLC 64 in class
- The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army 60 in class
- BAE Systems PLC 30 in class
- BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc. 27 in class
- Wrap Technologies, Inc. 23 in class
- Taser International, Inc. 22 in class
Allied's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
48 Top 18% higher than 82% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 7.7% |
| 2021 | 1 | 7.7% |
| 2022 | 2 | 15.4% |
| 2023 | 2 | 15.4% |
| 2024 | 2 | 15.4% |
| 2025partial year | 5 | 38.5% |
Which technologies does Allied Tube & Conduit Corporation patent most?
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Allied Tube & Conduit Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Allied Tube & Conduit Corporation's lead technology class is F41H (ARMOUR; Armoured TURRETS; Armoured OR Armed VEHICLES; Means OF Attack OR Defence, e.g. Camouflage, IN General), 46.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F41H
- Ranked #20,714 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Allied Tube & Conduit Corporation against Akwel SA, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 47.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.