Overall rank by patents
#25,763
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 7 technology areas, active 2016–2022. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A63B (APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT).
The verdict
Alert holds 10 US patents across 7 technology areas, rank #25,763 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Alert Core, Inc. has been granted 10 US utility patents between 2016 and 2022, placing Alert Core, Inc. at rank #25,763 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 7 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 15.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in A63B (APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT). As a US Corporation, Alert Core, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Alert sits between Akadeum Life Sciences, Inc. (10 patents, rank #25,759) and Allfasteners USA, Llc (10 patents, rank #25,767) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 28.1/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 4 grants, compared with 6 in the 2015–2019 window, a -33% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Alert Core, Inc.'s 15.6 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 7 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Alert Core, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Akadeum Life Sciences, Inc.
10 patents
Akoya Biosciences, Inc.
10 patents
Alcatel Submarine Networks
10 patents
Alcotek, Inc.
10 patents
Alex Global Technology, Inc.
10 patents
Alibaba Damo (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd.
10 patents
Allegro Artificial Intelligence LTD
10 patents
Allfasteners USA, LLC
10 patents
Alert Core, Inc.
10 patents
What this shows Alert holds 10 patents at rank #25,763, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Alert's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 Top 74% higher than 26% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2017 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 3 | 30.0% |
| 2020 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 10.0% |
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#25,763
Across all tracked assignees
28.1 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Alert's 10 grants land it in the top 74% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.