Aamp of Florida, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B60R (Vehicles, Vehicle Fittings, OR Vehicle Parts, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Aamp ranks #20,674 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 12 technology areas.
- #20,674
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 48%
- by Innovation Score (35.9/100)
- 18.7
- avg claims per patent
- +75%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R20674 · US Corporation #20,674 · 13 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
- MID-PACK #20,674/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH 7D Surgical ULC
- CPC-FOCUS B60R · 12 areas
- INNOV-THIN 35.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +75% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: 7D Surgical ULC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Aamp’s 35.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Aamp
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Aamp of Florida · this assignee
Aamp of Florida · this assignee
36 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Aamp's Innovation Score is 35.9/100 (top 48% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Aamp?
Each dot is one of Aamp’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Aamp’s own 18.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Aamp's grants concentrate
Aamp of Florida, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 69.2% of grants classified under B60R (Vehicles, Vehicle Fittings, OR Vehicle Parts, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Aamp sits between 7D Surgical ULC and Adama Agan Ltd..
Aamp's three-year grant acceleration
Aamp of Florida, Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Aamp's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- 7D Surgical ULC
7D Surgical ULC
13 patents
- @PAY IP Holdings
@PAY IP Holdings LLC
13 patents
- A&P Technology
A&P Technology, Inc.
13 patents
- Aadigen
Aadigen, LLC
13 patents
- AB Enzymes OY
AB Enzymes OY
13 patents
- ABB K K
ABB K.K.
13 patents
- Abbyson Living
Abbyson Living LLC
13 patents
- Adama Agan
Adama Agan Ltd.
13 patents
- Aamp of Florida ◀
Aamp of Florida, Inc.
13 patents
What this shows Aamp holds 13 patents at rank #20,676, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Aamp
By rank, the assignees closest to #20,676 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in B60R (Vehicles)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Aamp's primary technology class.
- Ford Global Technologies, LLC 3,270 in class
- Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha 1,796 in class
- Hyundai Motor Company 1,243 in class
- Honda Motor Co., Ltd. 1,168 in class
- GM Global Technology Operations LLC 1,072 in class
- Sumitomo Wiring Systems, Ltd. 1,013 in class
- Denso Corporation 890 in class
- Yazaki Corporation 825 in class
Aamp's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
36 Top 48% higher than 52% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 7.7% |
| 2017 | 1 | 7.7% |
| 2019 | 2 | 15.4% |
| 2020 | 2 | 15.4% |
| 2021 | 2 | 15.4% |
| 2023 | 2 | 15.4% |
| 2024 | 1 | 7.7% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 15.4% |
Which technologies does Aamp of Florida, Inc. patent most?
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Aamp of Florida, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Aamp of Florida, Inc.'s lead technology class is B60R (Vehicles, Vehicle Fittings, OR Vehicle Parts, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 69.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B60R
- Ranked #20,674 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Aamp of Florida, Inc. against 7D Surgical ULC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 35.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.