3D-Micromac AG
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B23K (Soldering OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; Cladding OR Plating BY Soldering OR WELDING; Cutting BY Applying Heat Locally, e.g. Flame CUTTING; Working BY Laser Beam).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, 3d-micromac ranks #30,704 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 12 technology areas.
- #30,704
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 45%
- by Innovation Score (37.0/100)
- 13.9
- avg claims per patent
- +200%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R30704 · Foreign Corporation #30,704 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #30,704/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH 152310 Canada
- CPC-FOCUS B23K · 12 areas
- INNOV-THIN 37.0/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 13.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +200% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: 152310 Canada (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How 3d-micromac’s 37.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around 3d-micromac
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- 3D-Micromac · this assignee
3D-Micromac · this assignee
37 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows 3d-micromac's Innovation Score is 37.0/100 (top 45% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for 3d-micromac?
Each dot is one of 3d-micromac’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). 3d-micromac’s own 13.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where 3d-micromac's grants concentrate
3D-Micromac AG is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 37.5% of grants classified under B23K (Soldering OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; Cladding OR Plating BY Soldering OR WELDING; Cutting BY Applying Heat Locally, e.g. Flame CUTTING; Working BY Laser Beam). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, 3d-micromac sits between 152310 Canada and 5D Robotics, Inc..
3d-micromac's three-year grant acceleration
3D-Micromac AG shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at 3D-Micromac's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- 152310 Canada
152310 Canada
8 patents
- 21
21, Inc.
8 patents
- 2109971 Ontario
2109971 Ontario Inc.
8 patents
- 360 Knee Systems…
360 Knee Systems Pty Ltd.
8 patents
- 3nine AB
3nine AB
8 patents
- 454 Life Sciences
454 Life Sciences Corporation
8 patents
- 4topps
4Topps LLC
8 patents
- 5D Robotics
5D Robotics, Inc.
8 patents
- 3d-micromac ◀
3D-Micromac AG
8 patents
What this shows 3D-Micromac holds 8 patents at rank #30,704, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near 3D-Micromac
By rank, the assignees closest to #30,704 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in B23K (Soldering OR Unsoldering)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in 3D-Micromac's primary technology class.
3d-micromac's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
37 Top 45% higher than 55% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2019 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2020 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2023 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | 12.5% |
Which technologies does 3D-Micromac AG patent most?
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
3D-Micromac AG's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- 3D-Micromac AG's lead technology class is B23K (Soldering OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; Cladding OR Plating BY Soldering OR WELDING; Cutting BY Applying Heat Locally, e.g. Flame CUTTING; Working BY Laser Beam), 37.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B23K
- Ranked #30,704 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare 3D-Micromac AG against 152310 Canada, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 37.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.