Overall rank by patents
#30,704
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 12 technology areas, active 2018–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B23K (SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM).
The verdict
3d-micromac holds 8 US patents across 12 technology areas, rank #30,704 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
3d-micromac Ag has been granted 8 US utility patents between 2018 and 2024, placing 3d-micromac Ag at rank #30,704 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 12 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 13.9 claims per patent with primary concentration in B23K (SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM). As a Foreign Corporation, 3d-micromac Ag is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, 3d-micromac sits between 152310 Canada (8 patents, rank #30,700) and 5D Robotics, Inc. (8 patents, rank #30,708) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 37.0/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 6 grants, compared with 2 in the 2015–2019 window, a +200% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. 3d-micromac Ag's 13.9 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 12 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark 3d-micromac Ag against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
152310 Canada
8 patents
21, Inc.
8 patents
2109971 Ontario Inc.
8 patents
360 Knee Systems Pty Ltd.
8 patents
3NINE AB
8 patents
454 Life Sciences Corporation
8 patents
4Topps LLC
8 patents
5D Robotics, Inc.
8 patents
3D-Micromac AG
8 patents
What this shows 3d-micromac holds 8 patents at rank #30,704, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #30,704 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in 3d-micromac's primary technology class.
3d-micromac's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
37 Top 45% higher than 55% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2019 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2020 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2023 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | 12.5% |
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#30,704
Across all tracked assignees
37.0 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
3d-micromac's 8 grants land it in the top 45% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.