Where does Kegel, LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Kegel, LLC ranks #48,086 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Kegel, LLC hold?

Kegel, LLC holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2020, spanning 8 technology areas.

What is Kegel, LLC's Innovation Score?

Kegel, LLC has an Innovation Score of 28.8 out of 100 (28th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Kegel, LLC focus on?

Kegel, LLC's top technology area is A63D (Bowling Games, e.g. Skittles, Bocce OR BOWLS; Installations THEREFOR; Bagatelle OR Similar GAMES; Billiards) with 3 patents, ranking #3 of 9 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 8 CPC subclasses total.

Is Kegel, LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Kegel, LLC's recent grant velocity is -75% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Kegel, LLC's patents?

Kegel, LLC's patents average 21.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Kegel, LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Kegel, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63D (Bowling Games, e.g. Skittles, Bocce OR BOWLS; Installations THEREFOR; Bagatelle OR Similar GAMES; Billiards).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Kegel ranks #48,086 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 8 technology areas.

#48,086
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 28th percentile
by Innovation Score (28.8/100): 21.0
avg claims per patent: -75%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R48086 · US Corporation #48,086 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #48,086/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Kazark
CPC-NARROW A63D · 8 areas
INNOV-THIN 28.8/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 21.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -75% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Kazark, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Kegel’s 28.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (22%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 10.0 pts (35%) Claim depth 12.6 pts (44%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Kegel · this assignee

29
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Kegel's Innovation Score is 28.8/100 (28th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Kegel?

Each dot is one of Kegel’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Kegel’s own 21.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Kegel vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Kegel's grants concentrate

Kegel, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under A63D (Bowling Games, e.g. Skittles, Bocce OR BOWLS; Installations THEREFOR; Bagatelle OR Similar GAMES; Billiards). By volume, Kegel sits between Kazark, Inc. and Kejr, Inc..

Kazark

5
Kedlin

5
Keewin Display

5
Keezio Group

5
Keihin Ramtech

5
Keirton

5
Keiryo Packaging

5
Kejr

5
Kegel ◀

5

What this shows Kegel holds 5 patents at rank #48,190, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Kegel

By rank, the assignees closest to #48,190 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63D (Bowling Games)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Kegel's primary technology class.

Kegel's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

29 28th percentile higher than 28% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Kegel, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	20.0%
2016	1	20.0%
2017	1	20.0%
2018	1	20.0%
2020	1	20.0%

Which technologies does Kegel, LLC patent most?

A63D - Bowling Games, e.g. Skittles, Bocce OR BOWLS; Installations THEREFOR; Bagatelle OR Similar GAMES; Billiards 3

C08G - Macromolecular Compounds Obtained Otherwise Than BY Reactions Only Involving Unsaturated Carbon-to-carbon Bonds 1

C08F - Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Involving Carbon-to-carbon Unsaturated Bonds 1

C09D - Coating Compositions, e.g. Paints, Varnishes OR LACQUERS; Filling PASTES; Chemical Paint OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; Correcting FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; Pastes OR Solids FOR Colouring OR PRINTING; USE OF Materials Therefor 1

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 1

A61Q - Specific USE OF Cosmetics OR Similar Toiletry Preparations 1

A61K - Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes 1

C11D - Detergent COMPOSITIONS; USE OF Single Substances AS DETERGENTS; Soap OR SOAP-MAKING; Resin SOAPS; Recovery OF Glycerol 1

Top 8 of 8 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Kegel, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Kegel, LLC's lead technology class is A63D (Bowling Games, e.g. Skittles, Bocce OR BOWLS; Installations THEREFOR; Bagatelle OR Similar GAMES; Billiards), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63D
Ranked #48,086 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Kegel, LLC against Kazark, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 28.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.