USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

xG Technology, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, xg ranks #38,373 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 5 technology areas.

#38,373
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
4th percentile
by Innovation Score (17.1/100)
3.3
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R38373 · US Corporation #38,373 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
  • LOWER-Q #38,373/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Å&R Carton Lund…
  • CPC-NARROW H04L · 5 areas
  • INNOV-LOW 17.1/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 3.3 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Å&R Carton Lund Aktiebolag (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How xg’s 17.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around xg

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows xg's Innovation Score is 17.1/100 (4th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for xg?

Each dot is one of xg’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). xg’s own 3.3 claims/patent is at or below the 15.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

xg vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 5.566.577.5 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent shallow.AI Inc. - 7, 18shallow AIsmartpolymer GmbH - 7, 18.29smartpolymersuitX, Inc. - 7, 26.14suitxvoestalpine Automotive Components Dettingen GmbH & Co. KG - 7, 14.57voestalpine Autom…Å&R Carton Lund Aktiebolag - 7, 11.29Å&R Carton Lund A…02Micro Inc. - 6, 15.8302micro10741841 Canada Inc - 6, 110741841 Canada12th Man Technologies, Inc. - 6, 1712th ManxG Technology, Inc. - 7, 3.29xg Technology
xg vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where xg's grants concentrate

xG Technology, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, xg sits between shallow.AI Inc. and 12th Man Technologies, Inc..

Who files at xG's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows xG holds 7 patents at rank #38,474, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near xG

By rank, the assignees closest to #38,474 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in xG's primary technology class.

xg's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

17 4th percentile higher than 4% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.533.5 201520162017 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2017

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
xG Technology, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 3 42.9%
2016 3 42.9%
2017 1 14.3%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

xG Technology, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • xG Technology, Inc.'s lead technology class is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04L
  • Ranked #38,373 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare xG Technology, Inc. against shallow.AI Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 17.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.