shallow.AI Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, shallow.ai ranks #37,428 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #37,428
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 19th percentile
- by Innovation Score (25.9/100)
- 18.0
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R37428 · US Corporation #37,428 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #37,428/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH manroland web systems
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 25.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2020–2021 · 2y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: manroland web systems GmbH (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How shallow.ai’s 25.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around shallow.ai
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- shallow AI · this assignee 26
shallow AI · this assignee
26 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows shallow.ai's Innovation Score is 25.9/100 (19th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for shallow.ai?
Each dot is one of shallow.ai’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). shallow.ai’s own 18.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where shallow.ai's grants concentrate
shallow.AI Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (5 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2021. By volume, shallow.ai sits between manroland web systems GmbH and xG Technology, Inc..
Who files at shallowAI's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- manroland web sys…
manroland web systems GmbH
7 patents
- messageloud
messageLOUD Inc.
7 patents
- okins
okins electronics Co., Ltd
7 patents
- selfrag
selFrag AG
7 patents
- smartpolymer
smartpolymer GmbH
7 patents
- suitx
suitX, Inc.
7 patents
- voestalpine Autom…
voestalpine Automotive Components Dettingen GmbH & Co. KG
7 patents
- xg Technology
xG Technology, Inc.
7 patents
- shallow AI ◀
shallow.AI Inc.
7 patents
What this shows shallow.AI holds 7 patents at rank #38,470, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near shallowAI
By rank, the assignees closest to #38,470 in granted patent volume.
- manroland web systems GmbH #38,466 · 7 patents
- messageLOUD Inc. #38,467 · 7 patents
- okins electronics Co., Ltd #38,468 · 7 patents
- selFrag AG #38,469 · 7 patents
- smartpolymer GmbH #38,471 · 7 patents
- suitX, Inc. #38,472 · 7 patents
- voestalpine Automotive Components Dettingen GmbH & Co. KG #38,473 · 7 patents
- xG Technology, Inc. #38,474 · 7 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in shallowAI's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
shallow.ai's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 19th percentile higher than 19% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 5 | 71.4% |
| 2021 | 2 | 28.6% |
Which technologies does shallow.AI Inc. patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
shallow.AI Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- shallow.AI Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #37,428 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare shallow.AI Inc. against manroland web systems GmbH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 25.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.