X-wave Innovations, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 14 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, X-wave ranks #30,630 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 14 technology areas.
- #30,630
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 17%
- by Innovation Score (48.3/100)
- 11.9
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R30630 · US Corporation #30,630 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
- MID-PACK #30,630/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH WÖHNER Besitz
- CPC-FOCUS G01N · 14 areas
- INNOV-PAR 48.3/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 11.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2022–2025 · 4y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: WÖHNER Besitz GMBH (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How X-wave’s 48.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around X-wave
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- X-wave Innovations · this assignee
X-wave Innovations · this assignee
48 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows X-wave's Innovation Score is 48.3/100 (top 17% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for X-wave?
Each dot is one of X-wave’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). X-wave’s own 11.9 claims/patent is at or below the 16.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where X-wave's grants concentrate
X-wave Innovations, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 14 CPC subclasses with 55.6% of grants classified under G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2024. By volume, X-wave sits between Wynalda Litho, Inc. and XGlow P/T, LLC.
X-wave's three-year grant acceleration
X-wave Innovations, Inc. shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at X-wave's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Wynalda Litho
Wynalda Litho, Inc.
9 patents
- WÖHNER Besitz
WÖHNER Besitz GMBH
9 patents
- X-control System
X-Control System Co., Ltd.
9 patents
- X-system
X-system Limited
9 patents
- Xefco PTY
Xefco PTY Ltd
9 patents
- Xenergic AB
Xenergic AB
9 patents
- Xenial
Xenial, Inc.
9 patents
- Xglow P/T
XGlow P/T, LLC
9 patents
- X-wave Innovations ◀
X-wave Innovations, Inc.
9 patents
What this shows X-wave holds 9 patents at rank #30,599, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near X-wave
By rank, the assignees closest to #30,599 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in X-wave's primary technology class.
- The Regents of the University of California 1,153 in class
- Shimadzu Corporation 1,111 in class
- Saudi Arabian OIL Company 837 in class
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. 816 in class
- The Boeing Company 701 in class
- General Electric Company 634 in class
- Kla-tencor Corporation 583 in class
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology 530 in class
X-wave's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
48 Top 17% higher than 83% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 2023 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2024 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2025partial year | 3 | 33.3% |
Which technologies does X-wave Innovations, Inc. patent most?
Top 14 of 14 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
X-wave Innovations, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- X-wave Innovations, Inc.'s lead technology class is G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties), 55.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01N
- Ranked #30,630 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare X-wave Innovations, Inc. against Wynalda Litho, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 48.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.