Where does X-Nav Technologies, LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), X-Nav Technologies, LLC ranks #23,692 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does X-Nav Technologies, LLC hold?

X-Nav Technologies, LLC holds 12 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2025, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is X-Nav Technologies, LLC's Innovation Score?

X-Nav Technologies, LLC has an Innovation Score of 34.4 out of 100 (47th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does X-Nav Technologies, LLC focus on?

X-Nav Technologies, LLC's top technology area is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification) with 8 patents, ranking #2,086 of 7,127 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

Is X-Nav Technologies, LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

X-Nav Technologies, LLC's recent grant velocity is -50% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for X-Nav Technologies, LLC's patents?

X-Nav Technologies, LLC's patents average 15.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the X-Nav Technologies, LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

X-Nav Technologies, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, X-nav ranks #23,692 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 7 technology areas.

#23,692
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 47th percentile
by Innovation Score (34.4/100): 15.8
avg claims per patent: -50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R23692 · US Corporation #23,692 · 12 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
MID-PACK #23,692/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Woodbury Wireless
CPC-NARROW A61B · 7 areas
INNOV-THIN 34.4/100
CLAIMS-RICH 15.8 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -50% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Woodbury Wireless, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How X-nav’s 34.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.9 pts (26%) Velocity 6.7 pts (19%) Breadth 9.4 pts (27%) Claim depth 9.5 pts (28%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
X-Nav · this assignee

34
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows X-nav's Innovation Score is 34.4/100 (47th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for X-nav?

Each dot is one of X-nav’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). X-nav’s own 15.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

X-nav vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where X-nav's grants concentrate

X-Nav Technologies, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, X-nav sits between Woodbury Wireless, LLC and Xiamen Sanan Integrated Circuit Co., Ltd..

X-nav's three-year grant acceleration

X-Nav Technologies, LLC shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Woodbury Wireless

12
Workspot

12
Worldwide Integra…

12
Wyndscent

12
Xcira

12
Xenogenic Develop…

12
Xi'an Eswin Mater…

12
Xiamen Sanan Inte…

12
X-nav ◀

12

What this shows X-Nav holds 12 patents at rank #23,679, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near X-Nav

By rank, the assignees closest to #23,679 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in X-Nav's primary technology class.

X-nav's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

34 47th percentile higher than 47% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

X-Nav Technologies, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	1	8.3%
2017	3	25.0%
2018	1	8.3%
2019	1	8.3%
2020	1	8.3%
2022	1	8.3%
2023	1	8.3%
2025partial year	3	25.0%

Which technologies does X-Nav Technologies, LLC patent most?

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 8

A61C - DENTISTRY; Apparatus OR Methods FOR Oral OR Dental Hygiene 7

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 3

G02B - Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus 1

A61F - Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive DEVICES; FOMENTATION; Treatment OR Protection OF Eyes OR EARS; Bandages, Dressings OR Absorbent PADS; Firs 1

G01S - Radio DIRECTION-FINDING; Radio NAVIGATION; Determining Distance OR Velocity BY USE OF Radio WAVES; Locating OR Presence-detecting BY USE OF THE Reflection OR Reradiation OF Radio WAVES; Analogous Arrangements Using Other Waves 1

A61K - Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes 1

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

X-Nav Technologies, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

X-Nav Technologies, LLC's lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
Ranked #23,692 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare X-Nav Technologies, LLC against Woodbury Wireless, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 34.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.