Where does Visual Graphic Systems Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Visual Graphic Systems Inc. ranks #43,966 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Visual Graphic Systems Inc. hold?

Visual Graphic Systems Inc. holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2024, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Visual Graphic Systems Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Visual Graphic Systems Inc. has an Innovation Score of 34.3 out of 100 (47th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Visual Graphic Systems Inc. focus on?

Visual Graphic Systems Inc.'s top technology area is G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals) with 4 patents, ranking #175 of 860 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

Is Visual Graphic Systems Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Visual Graphic Systems Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -50% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Visual Graphic Systems Inc.'s patents?

Visual Graphic Systems Inc.'s patents average 13.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Visual Graphic Systems Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Visual Graphic Systems Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Visual ranks #43,966 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 3 technology areas.

#43,966
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 47th percentile
by Innovation Score (34.3/100): 13.5
avg claims per patent: -50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R43966 · US Corporation #43,966 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #43,966/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH VisionNav Robotics USA
CPC-NARROW G09F · 3 areas
INNOV-THIN 34.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 13.5 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -50% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: VisionNav Robotics USA Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Visual’s 34.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (20%) Velocity 13.3 pts (39%) Breadth 6.1 pts (18%) Claim depth 8.1 pts (24%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Visual Graphic Systems · this assignee

34
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Visual's Innovation Score is 34.3/100 (47th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Visual?

Each dot is one of Visual’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Visual’s own 13.5 claims/patent is at or below the 14.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Visual vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Visual's grants concentrate

Visual Graphic Systems Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Visual sits between VisionNav Robotics USA Inc. and Viv Labs, Inc..

Visual's three-year grant acceleration

Visual Graphic Systems Inc. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Visionnav Robotic…

6
Viskoteepak Belgi…

6
Visplay Internati…

6
Visual Defence

6
Visualant

6
Vitaeris

6
Vitec Videocom

6
Viv Labs

6
Visual Graphic Sy… ◀

6

What this shows Visual holds 6 patents at rank #43,961, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Visual

By rank, the assignees closest to #43,961 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G09F (Displaying)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Visual's primary technology class.

Visual's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

34 47th percentile higher than 47% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Visual Graphic Systems Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	16.7%
2017	2	33.3%
2018	1	16.7%
2023	1	16.7%
2024	1	16.7%

Which technologies does Visual Graphic Systems Inc. patent most?

G09F - DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals 4

H01R - Electrically-conductive CONNECTIONS; Structural Associations OF A Plurality OF Mutually-insulated Electrical Connecting ELEMENTS; Coupling DEVICES; Current Collectors 2

G07F - Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus 1

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Visual Graphic Systems Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Visual Graphic Systems Inc.'s lead technology class is G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G09F
Ranked #43,966 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Visual Graphic Systems Inc. against VisionNav Robotics USA Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 34.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.