USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Viking Solutions, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A22B (Slaughtering).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Viking ranks #25,504 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 5 technology areas.

#25,504
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
5th percentile
by Innovation Score (18.5/100)
3.4
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R25504 · US Corporation #25,504 · 11 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
  • MID-PACK #25,504/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Versana Micro
  • CPC-NARROW A22B · 5 areas
  • INNOV-LOW 18.5/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 3.4 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Versana Micro Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Viking’s 18.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Viking

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Viking's Innovation Score is 18.5/100 (5th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Viking?

Each dot is one of Viking’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Viking’s own 3.4 claims/patent is at or below the 11.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Viking vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 10.910.91111.1 010203040 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Versana Micro Inc. - 11, 36.27Versana MicroVerwer Dahlias B.V. - 11, 1Verwer Dahlias B VViega GmbH & Co. KG - 11, 11.73Viega & KGViking Pump, Inc. - 11, 18.18Viking PumpVinglace, LLC - 11, 7.18VinglaceVirtual Strongbox, Inc. - 11, 16Virtual StrongboxVision Home Products, Inc. - 11, 4.18Vision Home Produ…Vissers Battery Corporation - 11, 33.45Vissers BatteryViking Solutions, LLC - 11, 3.36Viking Solutions
Viking vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Viking's grants concentrate

Viking Solutions, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 18.2% of grants classified under A22B (Slaughtering). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Viking sits between Versana Micro Inc. and Vissers Battery Corporation.

Who files at Viking's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Viking holds 11 patents at rank #25,500, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Viking

By rank, the assignees closest to #25,500 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A22B (Slaughtering)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Viking's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Viking, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A22B (Slaughtering), Viking ranks #29 of 52 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Viking's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

19 5th percentile higher than 5% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

02468 201520162017 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2017

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Viking Solutions, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 4 36.4%
2016 6 54.5%
2017 1 9.1%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Viking Solutions, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Viking Solutions, LLC's lead technology class is A22B (Slaughtering), 18.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A22B
  • Ranked #25,504 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Viking Solutions, LLC against Versana Micro Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 18.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.